结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 42-47.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2019.01.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra诊断结核性脑膜炎的价值

张培泽,郑俊峰,付亮,李天品,袁星燎,刘厚明,邓国防()   

  1. 518112 深圳市第三人民医院肺二科(张培泽、郑俊峰、付亮、邓国防),检验科微生物室(李天品、袁星燎、刘厚明);
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-21 出版日期:2019-03-30 发布日期:2019-04-03
  • 通信作者: 邓国防 E-mail:jxxk1035@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市科学技术创新计划(JCY20160427151540695)

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculous meningitis

Pei-ze ZHANG,Jun-feng ZHENG,Liang FU,Tian-pin LI,Xing-liao YUAN,Hou-ming LIU,Guo-fang. DENG()   

  1. Department Two of Pulmonary Medicine, Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Online:2019-03-30 Published:2019-04-03
  • Contact: Guo-fang. DENG E-mail:jxxk1035@yeah.net

摘要:

目的 探讨Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (简称“Xpert Ultra”)检测在早期诊断结核性脑膜炎的应用价值。方法 收集2018年2—12月临床疑似中枢神经系统感染的非HIV感染患者21例,所有患者脑脊液采用Xpert Ultra检测、Xpert MTB/RIF(简称“Xpert”)检测、液体培养法进行结核分枝杆菌检测。按照国际通用的结核性脑膜炎诊断标准,以临床评分≥6分作为参考标准,将研究对象分为结核性脑膜炎组15例和非结核性脑膜炎组6例。比较不同方法诊断结核性脑膜炎的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果 非结核性脑膜炎组6例患者的脑脊液Xpert Ultra检测、Xpert检测、液体培养均为阴性。结核性脑膜炎组15例患者的脑脊液中,10例(10/15,66.7%)Xpert Ultra检测阳性,4例(4/15,26.7%)脑脊液Xpert检测阳性,4例(4/15,26.7%)液体培养阳性。 Xpert Ultra用于脑脊液诊断结核性脑膜炎的敏感度为66.7%(10/15),特异度为100.0%(6/6),阳性预测值为100.0%(10/10),阴性预测值为54.5%(6/11)。Xpert与培养法结果一致,用于脑脊液诊断结核性脑膜炎的敏感度为26.7%(4/15),特异度为100.0%(6/6),阳性预测值为100.0%(4/4),阴性预测值为35.3%(6/17)。3种检测方法敏感度比较差异有统计学意义(χ 2=4.821,P=0.028)。10例Xpert Ultra检测阳性的患者中3例患者利福平耐药性无法判断,其中1例检测值为“极低”,2例检测值为“微量”,7例患者未检测到利福平耐药。结论 Xpert Ultra是目前诊断结核性脑膜炎最敏感的方法,可用于早期结核性脑膜炎的诊断;当Xpert Ultra检测到极低值或微量值时,存在利福平耐药性无法判断的问题,需要进一步对其耐药性进行验证。

关键词: 结核,脑膜, 脑脊髓液, 诊断技术和方法, 细菌学技术, 分子诊断技术, 数据说明,统计

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert Ultra) in the initial diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis among HIV-negative patients.Methods A total of 21 HIV-negative patients with suspected tuberculous meningitis from February to December 2018 were enrolled. Cerebrospinal fluid of all patients was examined for Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Xpert Ultra, Xpert MTB/RIF and liquid culture. According to the international diagnostic criteria for tuberculous meningitis, clinical score ≥6 points was used as the reference standard, and all patients were divided into tuberculous meningitis group (15 cases) and non-tuberculous meningitis group (6 cases). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of different diagnostic methods were compared.Results The cerebrospinal fluid of all 6 non-tuberculous meningitis patients was negative for Xpert Ultra, Xpert, and mycobacterial liquid cultures. Of the 15 patients with tuberculous meningitis, 10 (10/15, 66.7%) were positive for Xpert Ultra, 4 (4/15, 26.7%) were positive for Xpert, and 4 (4/15, 26.7%) were positive for liquid culture; Xpert Ultra was used for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis with sensitivity of 66.7% (10/15), specificity of 100.0% (6/6), positive predictive value of 100.0% (10/10), and negative predictive value of 54.5% (6/11). Xpert was consistent with liquid culture for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis, the sensitivity was 26.7% (4/15), specificity was 100.0% (6/6), positive predictive value was 100.0% (4/4), and negative predictive value was 35.3% (6/17). The difference of sensitivity among the three testing methods is statistically significant (χ 2=4.821,P=0.028). In the 10 Xpert Ultra positive patients, rifampicin resistance could not be determined in 3 patients (one test result was “very low” and another two were “trace call”), rifampicin resistance was not detected in the other 7 patients.Conclusion Xpert Ultra is the most sensitive method for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis and is recommended for initial diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. When Xpert Ultra detects result is very low or trace call, there is a problem that rifampicin resistance cannot be determined, and further verification of drug resistance is needed.

Key words: Tuberculosis,meningeal, Cerebrospinal fluid, Diagnostic techniques and procedures, Bacteriological techniques, Molecular diagnostic techniques, Data interpretation,statistical