Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease ›› 2021, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1): 26-30.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8493.2021.01.007

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the effectiveness of two different surgical methods on treating cervical lymph node tuberculosis

ZHANG Zhe-nan, JIANG Nan-yang, WANG Wei, JIANG Lian-ju, LIU Yu-qin()   

  1. Infectious Disease Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150500, China
  • Received:2020-12-24 Online:2021-03-30 Published:2021-03-24
  • Contact: LIU Yu-qin E-mail:liuyuqin_ssy@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To explore and analyze the effectiveness of two different surgical methods on treating cervical lymph node tuberculosis. Methods A total of 347 patients with cervical lymph node tuberculosis diagnosed bacteriologically or pathologically and treated by surgery in the Department of General Surgery of Heilongjiang Infectious Disease Hospital from January 2016 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 112 patients were treated with conventional debridement as the control group; 235 patients were treated with debridement combined with regional lymph node dissection as the study group. Cure rates, improvements of quality of life (QOL) scale, wound healing and complications of the two groups were analyzed. Results Cure rate of the study group (97.9%, 230/235) was significantly higher than that of the control group (84.8%, 95/112), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.14, P=0.029). Wound healing rate of grade A in the study group (90.6%, 213/235) was higher than that of the control group (63.4%, 71/112), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.71, P=0.018); the healing rates of grade B (8.5%, 20/235) and grade C (0.9%, 2/235) in the study group were lower than those of grade B (25.0%, 28/112) and grade C (11.6%, 13/112) in the control group, and those differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.16 and 4.43, P=0.032 and 0.028). Incidence of complications in the study group (5.1%, 12/235) was lower than that in the control group (17.9%, 20/112), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.17, P=0.012). After 3 months of anti-tuberculosis treatment, QOL score of the study group (52.83±2.19) was significantly higher than that of the control group (39.12±2.08), the difference was statistically significant (t=8.92, P=0.001). Conclusion Focus clearing combined with regional lymphadenectomy can effectively improve the postoperative healing rate, improve the rate of postoperative incision grade A healing, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Key words: Tuberculosis, lymph node, Neck dissection, Lymph node excision, Comparative effectiveness research