Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2): 96-101.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210129

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical evaluation of chest X-radiograph computer aided diagnostic system for pulmonary tuberculosis applied in primary hospitals

ZHANG Xiu-lei1, WANG Qian1, XIA Li2, LIU Yuan-Ming2, HAO Yan3, GUO Lin2()   

  1. 1Department of Prevention and Control, Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center, Ji’nan, China
    2Shenzhen Smart Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518109 China
    3Stony Brook University, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, New York NY11794, USA
  • Received:2021-10-11 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-04-18
  • Contact: GUO Lin E-mail:guolin913@outlook.com
  • Supported by:
    National Key R&D Program of China(2019YFE0121400);Shandong Province Medicine and Health Science and Technology Development Plan Project(2019WS533);Shenzhen Science and Technology Program(KQTD2017033110081833);Shenzhen Science and Technology Program(JSGG20201102162802008);Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program(JCYJ20190813153413160);Shandong Provincial Humanities and Social Science Project(2021-ZXJK-16)

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of using artificial intelligence (AI) based computer aided diagnostic (CAD) system on detecting pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in primary tuberculosis control and prevention facilities.Methods: A retrospective study enrolling 396 untreated presumptive tuberculosis cases was conducted from November 2020 to April 2021 in 8 TB dispensaries in Shandong province, and the clinical performance of the AI system was analyzed by making a comparison between the results from the AI system and from local radiologists.Results: The TB detection rate of AI system on 396 presumptive cases was higher than that of local radiologists (97.8% (131/134)) vs (75.4% (101/134))(χ2=28.88, P<0.05). The consistency between the AI system and local radiologists was 86.1% (341/396), and the false positive rates of the AI system and local radiologists were 0.8% (2/260) and 6.5% (17/260), respectively. In general, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of the AI system were 97.8% (95%CI: 93.3%-99.5%), 99.2% (95%CI: 97.1%-99.9%), 98.5% (95%CI: 94.3%-99.9%), 98.6% (95%CI: 96.5%-99.8%) and 98.7% (95%CI: 97.0%-99.6%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of local radiologists were 75.4% (95%CI: 67.4%-81.9%), 93.5% (95%CI: 89.8%-96.0%), 85.6% (95%CI: 78.0%-90.9%), 88.1% (95%CI: 83.8%-91.5%) and 87.4% (95%CI: 83.7%-90.3%).Conclusion: The AI system could help local radiologists in primary facilities improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Radiography, Artificial intelligence, Program evaluation

CLC Number: