结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2): 158-161.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
收稿日期:
2021-12-07
出版日期:
2022-06-30
发布日期:
2022-04-18
通信作者:
伍建林
E-mail:cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com
JIANG Ge-ge, LIANG Yuan, DU Li-na, WU Jian-lin()
Received:
2021-12-07
Online:
2022-06-30
Published:
2022-04-18
Contact:
WU Jian-lin
E-mail:cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com
摘要:
肺磨玻璃结节(GGN)科学化管理是临床关注的热点问题,其中对GGN样肺腺癌的准确诊断及浸润程度的预测具有很大挑战。近年来,基于CT影像的圆度测量逐渐应用于对GGN的评估与诊断,并显现出良好的临床应用前景。作者对该方面的研究现状与进展做一综述,以为医学影像诊断提供参考。
中图分类号:
姜阁阁, 梁媛, 都丽娜, 伍建林. CT圆度测量评估磨玻璃结节样肺腺癌浸润程度研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(2): 158-161. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
JIANG Ge-ge, LIANG Yuan, DU Li-na, WU Jian-lin. Research progress of CT roundness measurement in evaluating the invasiveness of GGN-like lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(2): 158-161. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
[1] |
刘琳, 焦宗林, 曾媛, 等. 浸润性肺腺癌不同病理亚型的研究进展. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(5):436-438,466. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2020.18.05.02.
doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2020.18.05.02 |
[2] |
Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 178(5):1053-1057. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053 URL |
[3] |
高鹏, 董志辉, 莫哲恒, 等. 亚厘米纯磨玻璃密度肺腺癌的计算机断层扫描特征及临床意义. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(7):728-730,755. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535. 2020.18.07.22.
doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535. 2020.18.07.22 |
[4] |
Kakinuma R, Noguchi M, Ashizawa K, et al. Natural History of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Thorac Oncol, 2016, 11(7):1012-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.006 pmid: 27089851 |
[5] |
Inamura K. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Mutations Driving Development of Early Lung Adenocarcinoma: Tumor Initiation and Progression. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(4):1259. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041259.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19041259 URL |
[6] |
黄定品, 傅钢泽, 蔡蒙婷, 等. 亚厘米纯磨玻璃密度结节肺腺癌的CT特征对其浸润性的预测价值. 温州医科大学学报, 2019, 49(11):837-841. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2019.11.010.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2019.11.010 |
[7] |
Heidinger BH, Anderson KR, Nemec U, et al. Lung Adenocarcinoma Manifesting as Pure Ground-Glass Nodules: Correlating CT Size, Volume, Density, and Roundness with Histopathologic Invasion and Size. J Thorac Oncol, 2017, 12(8):1288-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.017.
doi: S1556-0864(17)30425-2 pmid: 28576745 |
[8] |
Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, et al. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology, 2007, 245(1):267-275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682 URL |
[9] |
Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios. Radiographics, 2018, 38(5):1337-1350. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017 URL |
[10] |
Ding H, Shi J, Zhou X, et al. Value of CT Characteristics in Predicting Invasiveness of Adenocarcinoma Presented as Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 65(2):136-141. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587592.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587592 URL |
[11] |
Snoeckx A, Reyntiens P, Desbuquoit D, et al. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: size matters, but do not ignore the power of morphology. Insights Imaging, 2018, 9(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0581-2.
doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0581-2 URL |
[12] |
Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology, 2008, 246(3):697-722. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070712.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070712 pmid: 18195376 |
[13] |
Gu J, Lu C, Guo J, et al. Prognostic significance of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients-A single institution retrospective study of 292 lung adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol, 2013, 107(5):474-480. doi: 10.1002/jso.23259.
doi: 10.1002/jso.23259 URL |
[14] |
Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, et al. New IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and invasive tumor size are predictive of disease recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol, 2013, 8(5):612-618. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318287c3eb.
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318287c3eb pmid: 23584293 |
[15] |
Xu CH, Wang W, Wei Y, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(10):1430-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.004 pmid: 26123994 |
[16] |
Zhao Y, Wang R, Shen X, et al. Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(6):2099-2105. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5043-9.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5043-9 pmid: 26842488 |
[17] |
Hung JJ, Jeng WJ, Chou TY, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society lung adenocarcinoma classification on death and recurrence in completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(6):1079-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828920c0.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828920c0 URL |
[18] |
Miyoshi T, Shirakusa T, Ishikawa Y, et al. Possible mechanism of metastasis in lung adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern. Pathol Int, 2005, 55(7):419-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01847.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01847.x pmid: 15982217 |
[19] |
Roh MS, Lee JI, Choi PJ, et al. Relationship between micropapillary component and micrometastasis in the regional lymph nodes of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Histopathology, 2004, 45(6):580-586. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01953.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01953.x pmid: 15569048 |
[20] |
Chao L, Yi-Sheng H, Yu C, et al. Relevance of EGFR mutation with micropapillary pattern according to the novel IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification and correlation with prognosis in Chinese patients. Lung Cancer, 2014, 86(2):164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.018 pmid: 25236981 |
[21] |
Borghesi A, Scrimieri A, Michelini S, et al. Quantitative CT analysis for predicting the behavior of part-solid nodules with solid components less than 6 mm: size, density and shape descriptors. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(16):3428. doi: 10.3390/app9163428.
doi: 10.3390/app9163428 URL |
[22] |
Lee G, Park H, Lee HY, et al. Tumor Margin Contains Prognostic Information: Radiomic Margin Characteristics Analysis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(7):1676. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071676.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13071676 URL |
[23] |
巴文娟, 许迪, 尹柯, 等. HRCT征象评估纯磨玻璃结节浸润性:肺结节圆度优于长-短径比值和分叶深度. 放射学实践, 2020, 35(12):1542-1546. doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2020.12.009.
doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2020.12.009 |
[24] |
Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP, et al. A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules: part 1: radiologic characteristics and imaging modalities. Chest, 2013, 143(3):825-839. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0960.
doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0960 URL |
[25] |
Li X, Zhang W, Yu Y, et al. CT features and quantitative analysis of subsolid nodule lung adenocarcinoma for pathological classification prediction. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6556-6.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6556-6 URL |
[26] |
江森, 洪又佳, 李仰康. 肿瘤圆度——MRI形态学特征的量化指标在乳腺良恶性肿瘤及不同分子亚型乳腺癌中的应用研究. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(8):1289-1293. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.08.013.
doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.08.013 |
[27] |
Bae MS, Seo M, Kim KG, et al. Quantitative MRI morphology of invasive breast cancer: correlation with immunohistochemical biomarkers and subtypes. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(3):269-275. doi: 10.1177/0284185114524197.
doi: 10.1177/0284185114524197 URL |
[28] |
Yoon GY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al. Sonographic features that can be used to differentiate between small triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma. Ultrasonography, 2018, 37(2):149-156. doi: 10.14366/usg.17036.
doi: 10.14366/usg.17036 URL |
[29] |
Cao X, Li X, Wang X, et al. Use CT Imaging to Predict the Short-Term Outcome of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dose Response, 2019, 17(4): 1559325819897175. doi: 10.1177/1559325819897175.
doi: 10.1177/1559325819897175 |
[30] | 胡晓华, 陈娟, 王军. 研究胸部CT检查在孤立性肺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(4):217-218. |
[31] |
金鑫, 赵绍宏, 高洁, 等. 纯磨玻璃密度肺腺癌病理分类及影像表现特点分析. 中华放射学杂志, 2014, 48(4):283-287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.04.005.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.04.005 |
[32] |
余世裕. 磨玻璃密度肺结节的CT征象特点及定性诊断分析. 现代医用影像学, 2021, 30(2):310-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.02.028.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.02.028 |
[33] |
俞慧波, 陈中港, 李琼, 等. 月牙征预测纯磨玻璃结节肺腺癌浸润性的价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2021, 55(4):403-408. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200609-00791.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200609-00791 |
[34] |
Kobayashi Y, Mitsudomi T. Management of ground-glass opacities: should all pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity be surgically resected? Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2013, 2(5):354-363. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.09.03.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.09.03 |
[35] |
Nemec U, Heidinger BH, Anderson KR, et al. Software-based risk stratification of pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground glass nodules on computed tomography. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(1):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4937-2.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4937-2 URL |
[36] |
Borghesi A, Michelini S, Bertagna F, et al. Hilly or mountainous surface: a new CT feature to predict the behavior of pure ground glass nodules? Eur J Radiol Open, 2018, 5:177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.09.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.09.004 pmid: 30294620 |
[37] |
Aoki T. Predicting factors of ground-glass lung nodule for growth. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(Suppl 33):S3927-S3929. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.129.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.129 URL |
[38] |
李媛, 谢惠康, 武春燕. WHO胸部肿瘤分类(第5版)中肺肿瘤部分解读. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(7):574-580. doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.07.003.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.07.003 |
[1] | 古力米娜·阿布力米提, 麦维兰江·阿不力米提, 地尔木拉提·吐逊, 刘振江, 何懿, 苏伟, 欧喜超. 2021年喀什地区肺结核患者利福平耐药影响因素分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 269-273. |
[2] | 李义帅, 秦学博, 李香兰, 魏兰, 段小亮, 张磊, 陈亮, 李建行. 电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗难治性空洞性肺结核的效果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 292-295. |
[3] | 郦源, 郭茹茹, 吕良敬. 结缔组织病合并结核病的研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 309-314. |
[4] | 张晓林, 李锋. 肺结核致呼吸衰竭研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 320-324. |
[5] | 何燕超, 揭志军. 综合医院活动性肺结核的早期筛查策略[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 334-337. |
[6] | 周伊南, 朱惠莉. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺结核的研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 338-342. |
[7] | 陈木兴, 范欣欣, 陈晓红, 林友飞, 黄明翔, 陈力舟, 吴迪. T淋巴细胞亚群检测在新型冠状病毒肺炎临床应用价值中的研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 343-346. |
[8] | 程娟, 贺晓英, 刘铭辉, 韩守华, 陈磊, 刘光福, 潘兆宝, 严琨. 苏尔加分枝杆菌肺病一例[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(4): 347-352. |
[9] | 顾芬, 王琳. 重视慢性肺部疾病的早期肺康复护理[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 177-180. |
[10] | 王琳, 沈雪晴, 严婷婷. 老年脑卒中患者肺部感染2周预后影响因素分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 181-186. |
[11] | 赵虹, 高小丽, 郭贝贝, 吕莎. 物联网联合多学科诊疗康复护理模式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复效果的影响[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 187-192. |
[12] | 龚道敏, 朱凌, 田甜, 钟浈. 肺癌合并肺结核患者预感性悲伤影响因素分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 193-197. |
[13] | 徐翠玲, 蒋钰辉, 徐芳. 超前镇痛护理干预对肺结核胸部术后镇痛的效果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 198-202. |
[14] | 徐艳松, 刘庆华, 邱筱婷. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者症状群及其亚组识别的研究[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 203-208. |
[15] | 冼少静, 陈燕, 马义铭, 罗丽娟, 龙颖姣. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者呼吸道病原菌构成特点及其影响因素分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(3): 209-215. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||