结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2): 136-139.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8493.2020.02.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

利奈唑胺治疗广泛耐药肺结核疗效分析

王颖(), 蔡春葵, 许岩, 孙诗学, 李刚, 顾晓峰, 于洋   

  1. 116031 大连市结核病医院耐药病房
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-25 出版日期:2020-09-30 发布日期:2020-10-15
  • 通信作者: 王颖 E-mail:15792768@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    大连市耐药结核病防控项目实施效果评价(2018J13SN110)

Efficacy analysis of linezolid in the treatment of XDR-PTB

WANG Ying(), CAI Chun-kui, XU Yan, SUN Shi-xue, LI Gang, GU Xiao-feng, YU Yang   

  1. Department of Resistant Tuberculosis, Dalian Tuberculosis Hospital, Dalian 116031, China
  • Received:2020-06-25 Online:2020-09-30 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: WANG Ying E-mail:15792768@qq.com

摘要:

目的 研究利奈唑胺治疗广泛耐药肺结核(XDR-PTB)患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。方法 搜集2012年7月至2019年12月纳入大连市耐药结核病防控项目的65例XDR-PTB患者,根据患者用药史及个体化治疗方案是否包含利奈唑胺分为对照组(进行常规化疗,方案中未采用利奈唑胺;31例)和观察组(采用利奈唑胺联合常规化疗;34例),比较两组患者疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组在治疗6、12个月及治疗结束时痰结核分枝杆菌培养阴转率分别为47.1%(16/34)、67.6%(23/34)和61.8%(21/34),均明显高于对照组[分别为16.1%(5/31)、35.5%(11/31)和32.3%(10/31)],差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为7.093、6.724、5.659,P值分别为0.008、0.010、0.017)。治疗结束后,观察组73.5%(25/34)的患者胸部X线摄影检查显示病灶好转,明显高于对照组的41.9%(13/31),差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.665,P=0.010);79.4%(27/34)的患者临床症状明显改善,明显高于对照组的51.6%(16/31),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.597,P=0.018)。但在不良反应方面,观察组患者下肢麻木发生率为29.4%(10/34),贫血发生率为11.8%(4/34),对照组均未发生上述不良反应。结论 利奈唑胺对于治疗XDR-PTB疗效明确,但不良反应较多,需对患者进行密切观察及相应的治疗。

关键词: 泛耐药结核病, 利奈唑胺, 多种药物疗法, 疗效比较研究

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of linezolid in the treatment of extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (XDR-PTB) patients. Methods Sixty-five XDR-PTB patients enrolled in Dalian Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Project from July 2012 to December 2019 were divided into control group (routine chemotherapy without linezolid, 31 cases) and observation group (linezolid combined with routine chemotherapy, 34 cases) according to their drug history and whether the individualized treatment regimen included linezolid. The therapeutic effect and the occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. Results The conversion rate of sputum culture at 6 months, 12 months and the end of treatment in observation group were 47.1% (16/34), 67.6% (23/34) and 61.8% (21/34) respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the control group (16.1% (5/31), 35.5% (11/31) and 32.3% (10/31)). The differences were statistical significance (χ2 were 7.093, 6.724 and 5.659, P values were 0.008, 0.010 and 0.017). At the end of treatment, chest radiograph of 73.5% (25/34) patients in the observation group showed improvement of the lesion, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (41.9%, 13/31). The difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.665, P=0.010). The clinical symptoms of 27 patients in the observation group (79.4%, 27/34) were significantly improved, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (51.6%, 16/31) (χ2=5.597, P=0.018). However, in terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of lower limb numbness in the observation group was 29.4% (10/34), and the incidence of anemia was 11.8% (4/34), the control group did not have the above adverse reactions. Conclusion Linezolid has a definite therapeutic effect on XDR-PTB, but there are many adverse reactions exist, so that patients should be closely observed and treated.

Key words: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, Linezolid, Polypharmacy, Comparative effectiveness research