结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 146-148.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2018.02.015

• 短篇论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经纤维支气管镜局部注药联合化疗治疗耐多药肺结核的临床效果

孟素华()   

  1. 114000 辽宁省鞍山市千山医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-26 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-08-02

Clinical efficacy of local drug administration by bronchfiberscope combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis

Su-hua. MENG()   

  1. Department of Internal Medicine,Qianshan Hospital of Anshan City, Liaoning Province, Anshan 114000,China
  • Received:2018-02-26 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-08-02

摘要:

搜集辽宁省鞍山市千山医院2015年5月至2016年7月收治的90例耐多药肺结核患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各45例患者。经医院伦理学委员会批准,对照组进行单纯化疗,观察组采用经纤维支气管镜局部注药联合化疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。观察组总有效率为68.89%(31/45),与对照组的44.44%(20/45)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=5.48, P=0.019);观察组病灶总改善率为84.44%(38/45),与对照组的48.89%(22/45)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=12.80, P=0.000);观察组空洞吸收总改善率为81.08%(30/37),与对照组的54.29%(19/35)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=8.60, P=0.003);治疗9个月后,观察组痰菌阴转率为91.11%(41/45),与对照组的46.67%(21/45)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=20.74,P=0.000);观察组患者的好转率为75.56%(34/45),与对照组的44.44%(20/45)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=9.07,P=0.003);治疗期间两组患者均未出现严重不良反应。可见,经纤维支气管镜局部注药联合化疗对耐多药肺结核患者的临床治疗效果较单纯化疗更好。

关键词: 结核, 肺, 抗多种药物性, 支气管镜检查, 药物疗法, 对比研究

Abstract:

Ninety cases of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis admitted from May 2015 to July 2016 at Qianshan Hospital of Anshan City, Liaoning Province were selected in this study. The subjects were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method (45 cases in each group). After approval by the Ethics Committee, subjects in the control group was treated with chemotherapy alone, whereas those in the observation group received local drug administration by bronchfiberscope combined with chemotherapy. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. The overall effective rate was 68.89% (31/45) in the observation group and 44.44% (20/45) in the control group; the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=5.48, P=0.019). The overall rate of improvement in lesions was 84.44% (38/45) in the observation group and 48.89% (22/45) in the control group; the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=12.80, P=0.000). The overall rate of improvement in cavitation absorption was 81.08% (30/37) in the observation group, compared with 54.29% (19/35) of the control group; the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=8.60, P=0.003). Nine months after the treatment, the rate of sputum negative conversion in the observation group was 91.11% (41/45), which was higher than 46.67% (21/45) of the control group; the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=20.74, P=0.000). The improvement rate was 75.56% (34/45) in the observation group and 44.44% (20/45) in the control group; the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=9.07, P=0.003). No serious adverse reactions occurred in the two groups during treatment. In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of local drug administration by bronchfiberscope combined with chemo-therapy in the treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis is superior to chemotherapy alone.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Multidrug-resistant, Bronchoscopy, Drug therapy, Comparative study