活动性结核病患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率的Meta分析

doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024128

结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (5): 404-414.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024128

活动性结核病患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率的Meta分析

李晓雪¹, 肖筱², 徐春华³, 董书澜¹, 王珊珊¹, 曹佳颐¹, 吴哲渊², 胡屹¹, 沈鑫²()

¹复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海 200032
²上海市疾病预防控制中心结核病与艾滋病防治所,上海 200336
³上海市奉贤区疾病预防控制中心结核病防治科,上海 201499

收稿日期:2024-08-06 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-10-14
通信作者: 沈鑫 E-mail:shenxin@scdc.sh.cn
基金资助:
上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2023—2025)重点学科项目(GWVI-11.1-05);优秀青年人才项目(GWVI-11.2-YQ16)

The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among close contacts of active tuberculosis patients: a Meta-analysis

Li Xiaoxue¹, Xiao Xiao², Xu Chunhua³, Dong Shulan¹, Wang Shanshan¹, Cao Jiayi¹, Wu Zheyuan², Hu Yi¹, Shen Xin²()

¹Fudan School of Public Health, Shanghai 200032, China
²Tuberculosis and AIDS Prevention and Control Institute, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China
³Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Shanghai Fengxian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201499, China

Received:2024-08-06 Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-10-14
Contact: Shen Xin E-mail:shenxin@scdc.sh.cn
Supported by:
Shanghai Three-year (2023—2025) Action Plan to Strengthen the Public Health System(GWVI-11.1-05);Distinguished Young Scholars Program(GWVI-11.2-YQ16)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：评价不同结核病负担地区、不同筛查技术、不同筛查策略的活动性结核病患者密切接触者的结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(简称“潜伏感染”)率。方法：通过检索中国期刊全文数据库、Web of Science、Medline和Embase数据库,按照文献纳入和排除标准筛选文献。共纳入214篇文献,从其中33篇文献中提取结核病续发率,从214篇文献中提取感染率。将纳入文献分别以研究地区、筛查技术、筛查策略进行分组,应用Meta分析的方法,计算并比较密切接触者调查所发现的潜伏感染率和(或)结核病续发率。结果：结核病高负担国家密切接触者潜伏感染率为12.0%(95%CI:9.0%~16.0%),高于低负担国家密切接触者潜伏感染率[7.0%(95%CI:5.8%~11.0%)];结核菌素皮肤试验筛查潜伏感染率为41.0%(95%CI:33.0%~49.0%),略高于γ-干扰素释放试验的36.0%(95%CI:26.0%~45.0%);通过对涂阳和涂阴患者密切接触者的调查,潜伏感染率分别为34.0%(95%CI:23.0%~45.0%)和20.0%(95%CI:10.0%~30.0%);家庭密切接触者潜伏感染率为24.0%(95%CI:16.0%~33.0%),高于一般人群(13.0%~20.0%);密切接触者中15岁以下儿童续发率高达4.6%(95%CI:2.6%~7.1%),高于15~60岁人群的2.6%(95%CI:0.9%~4.3%)及60岁以上人群的3.3%(95%CI:0.9%~4.3%);60岁以上人群潜伏感染率达31.0%(95%CI:0.9%~60.0%),高于15岁以下儿童的25.0%(95%CI:18.0%~33.0%)。结论：在结核病高负担国家,针对涂阳患者密切接触者的调查,以及家庭密切接触者的针对性筛查,是早期发现结核病患者的有效手段,儿童和老年人应作为密切接触者调查的重点对象。

关键词: 结核, 分枝杆菌感染, 接触者追踪, Meta分析(主题)

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the latent tuberculosis infection prevalence among tuberculosis (TB) contacts across various regions with different TB burdens by utilizing different screening technologies and strategies. Methods: We screened studies by searching the Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Web of Science, Medline and Embase, selecting studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 214 articles were enrolled, 33 articles were used for extracting secondary incidence rate of tuberculosis and all articles provided prevalence of latent TB infection. Studies were categorized by study areas, screening techniques and screening strategies, respectively, then a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate and compare the prevalence of TB and latent tuberculosis infection among contacts of patients. Results: The prevalence of latent TB infection was 12.0% (95%CI: 9.0%-16.0%) among contacts from high TB burden settings, higher than those living in low-burden countries (7.0%, 95%CI: 5.8%-11.0%). Prevalence of latent infection detected by tuberculin skin test was higher than that detected by IFN-γ released assay (41.0%, 95%CI: 33.0%-49.0% vs. 36.0%, 95%CI: 26.0%-45.0%). Among contacts of smear-positive patients, the prevalence of latent infection was 34.0% (95%CI: 23.0%-45.0%), compared to 20.0% (95%CI:10.0%-30.0%) among the contacts of smear-negative patients. The prevalence of latent infection among household contacts was 24.0% (95%CI: 16.0%-33.0%), higher than that of the general population (13.0%-20.0%). The secondary incidence rate among close contacts aged under 15 years was as high as 4.6% (95%CI: 2.6%-7.1%), which exceeded those observed in individuals aged 15 to 60 years (2.6%, 95%CI: 0.9%-4.3%), and those over 60 years (3.3%, 95%CI: 0.9%-4.3%). The prevalence of latent infection among population aged above 60 years old was 31.0% (95%CI: 0.9%-60.0%), higher than that in children <15 years of age (25.0%, 95%CI: 18.0%-33.0%). Conclusion: In countries with a high burden of tuberculosis, the targeted screening strategies in close contacts of smear-positive patients and household contacts, constitutes an effective approach for early identification of tuberculosis cases. Children and the elderly should be the focus of screening.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Mycobacterium infections, Contact tracing, Meta-analysis as topic

中图分类号:

R183.3

李晓雪, 肖筱, 徐春华, 董书澜, 王珊珊, 曹佳颐, 吴哲渊, 胡屹, 沈鑫. 活动性结核病患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率的Meta分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(5): 404-414. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024128

Li Xiaoxue, Xiao Xiao, Xu Chunhua, Dong Shulan, Wang Shanshan, Cao Jiayi, Wu Zheyuan, Hu Yi, Shen Xin. The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among close contacts of active tuberculosis patients: a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2024, 5(5): 404-414. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024128

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 17

[1]	舒薇, 刘宇红. 世界卫生组织《2023年全球结核病报告》解读. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5 (1): 15-19. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024006.
[2]	Balcells ME, Carvajal C, Fernández P, et al. Systematic screening of adult household contacts of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis reveals high rates of new infections during follow-up. Rev Med Chil, 2020, 148(2): 151-159. doi:10.4067/s0034-98872020000200151. pmid: 32730491
[3]	Ghanaiee RM, Karimi A, Hoseini-Alfatemi SM, et al. Household contact investigation for the detection of active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis: A comprehensive evaluation in two high-burden provinces in Iran. New Microbes New Infect, 2022, 45: 100958. doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2022.100958.
[4]	Warria K, Nyamthimba P, Chweya A, et al. Tuberculosis disease and infection among household contacts of bacteriologically confirmed and non-confirmed tuberculosis patients. Trop Med Int Health, 2020, 25(6): 695-701. doi:10.1111/tmi.13392. pmid: 32170771
[5]	Chang V, Ling RH, Velen K, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection among contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in New South Wales, Australia. ERJ Open Res, 2021, 7(3): 00149-2021. doi:10.1183/23120541.00149-2021.
[6]	Karbito K, Susanto H, Adi MS, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection in family members in household contact with active tuberculosis patients in Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. J Public Health Afr, 2022, 13(2): 2157. doi:10.4081/jphia.2022.2157.
[7]	Ludi Z, Sule AA, Samy RP, et al. Diagnosis and biomarkers for ocular tuberculosis: From the present into the future. Theranostics, 2023, 13(7): 2088-2113. doi:10.7150/thno.81488. pmid: 37153734
[8]	Dalmau M, Coulter C, O’Connor B, et al. A five-year analysis of latent tuberculosis infection in Queensland, 2016—2020. Commun Dis Intell (2018), 2023, 47. doi:10.33321/cdi.2023.47.71.
[9]	World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: diagnosis. Tests for tuberculosis infection. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022.
[10]	Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015, 15(3): 310-319. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0. pmid: 25681063
[11]	Lienhardt C, Fielding K, Hane AA, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of IFN-gamma release assay and tuberculin skin test in household contacts of infectious tuberculosis cases in Senegal. PLoS One, 2010, 5(5): e10508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010508.
[12]	Fox GJ, Anh NT, Nhung NV, et al. Latent tuberculous infection in household contacts of multidrug-resistant and newly diagnosed tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2017, 21(3): 297-302. doi:10.5588/ijtld.16.0576. pmid: 28225339
[13]	Pinto PFPS, Teixeira CSS, Ichihara MY, et al. Incidence and risk factors of tuberculosis among 420-854 household contacts of patients with tuberculosis in the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort (2004-18): a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2024, 24(1): 46-56. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00371-7.
[14]	魏靖入, 陈卉, 成君. 高中学生肺结核筛查和预防性治疗研究进展. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5 (4): 358-363. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024072.
[15]	Limungi GM, Mburugu PM, Kirigia C, et al. Treatment outcomes and challenges of treating tuberculosis in children in a nomadic pastoralist community in Kenya. Afr Health Sci, 2023, 23(4): 42-47. doi:10.4314/ahs.v23i4.7.
[16]	Whalen CC, Zalwango S, Chiunda A, et al. Secondary attack rate of tuberculosis in urban households in Kampala, Uganda. PLoS One, 2011, 6(2): e16137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016137.
[17]	仵倩红, 张燕, 刘鑫. 多学科持续发力终结结核病流行. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5 (4): 279-282. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024052.

活动性结核病患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率的Meta分析

The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among close contacts of active tuberculosis patients: a Meta-analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

友情链接

[1]	陈禹, 李晓睿, 王妙然, 张雨颀, 刘畅, 王照华, 石杰, 樊丽超, 尹智华, 谢建平. 金属离子在结核病中的作用研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 102-112.
[2]	徐雁南, 方梓昊, 赵文丽, 郑佳雄, 刘苏洋, 林健雄, 纪丽微, 常巧呈. 中国异烟肼耐药结核分枝杆菌基因突变特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 14-21.
[3]	万莹, 庞学文, 张帆. 2010—2020年天津市结核病防治健康促进工作效果评价[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 22-29.
[4]	赵永年, 张丽杰, 王童敏. 2014—2023年新疆生产建设兵团肺结核报告发病流行病学特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 30-34.
[5]	郑建莉, 吴语媚, 张仕利, 杜恣闲, 李土荣, 陈石生, 林文革. 福建省龙岩市结核病重点高危人群主动筛查成本效果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 35-39.
[6]	杨艳, 董文, 陈建军, 张玉. 2014—2023年湖北省十堰市竹溪县肺结核流行特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 40-45.
[7]	齐威, 赵恩奕. 2006—2020年天津市中心城区老年与非老年肺结核流行特征及变化趋势[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 46-54.
[8]	阎庆虎, 薛峰, 于泳, 秦毅, 阎庆梅, 崔嘉. 超声引导下微波消融技术在局限性结核病变治疗中的价值分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 55-60.
[9]	陈静, 秦娅莉, 王明栋, 杨儒斌, 王倩, 彭燕清, 邱继瑶, 张晓, 周昕艾. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus检测活动性肺结核的效能分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 61-67.
[10]	顾金花, 张盼盼. 三种结核分枝杆菌检测方法在某综合医院的应用价值评估[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 68-72.
[11]	闫文华, 陈文君. 数智化健康教育在菌阳肺结核患者陪护者预防管理中的价值[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 73-78.
[12]	廖影, 庞艳, 赵静, 何高琴, 游茂林, 王蕾. 2018—2023年重庆市梁平区肺结核患者报告情况及发现延迟特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 8-13.
[13]	张莹, 郭春辉. 结核性气管支气管狭窄的治疗研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 87-93.
[14]	杨舒琪, 李锋. 程序性死亡受体1/程序性死亡-配体1抑制剂在结核病研究中的进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 94-101.
[15]	欧庆芬. 非结核分枝杆菌肺病的CT诊断及鉴别诊断[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 13-14.