结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 168-171.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2019.03.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种分子诊断技术对提高结核病病原学检测阳性率的评价研究

宋红焕,邵燕,李燕,李国莉,陈诚,竺丽梅,陆伟()   

  1. 210009 南京,江苏省疾病预防控制中心慢性传染病防制所
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-04 出版日期:2019-09-30 发布日期:2019-10-15
  • 通信作者: 陆伟 E-mail:jsjkmck@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省青年医学人才计划(QNRC2016541);江苏省第五期“333高层次人才培养工程”计划;江苏省卫计委“卫生拔尖人才”项目(LGY2017083;LGY2018067)

Evaluation of two molecular diagnostic tests in improving the pathogenic positive rate for detection of tuberculosis

SONG Hong-huan,SHAO Yan,LI Yan,LI Guo-li,CHEN Cheng,ZHU Li-mei,LU Wei.()   

  1. Institute of Chronic Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Disease Prevention and Control Center, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2019-09-04 Online:2019-09-30 Published:2019-10-15
  • Contact: Wei. LU E-mail:jsjkmck@163.com

摘要:

目的 评价两种分子诊断技术[恒温扩增技术检测结核分枝杆菌复合群核酸技术(以下简称:恒温扩增技术)与半巢式全自动实时荧光定量PCR检测技术(以下简称:GeneXpert技术)]对提高结核病病原学检测阳性率的作用。方法 从《中国疾病预防控制结核病专报系统》获取江苏省23个使用GeneXpert技术的县(区)[以下简称A类县(区)]和46个使用恒温扩增技术的县区[以下简称B类县(区)]2018年活动性结核病患者信息(单纯结核性胸膜炎除外),以及全年确诊活动性肺结核患者的总例数。两类县(区)结核病疑似患者首先进行痰涂片检测,痰涂片阴性患者进行分子检测,同步采用L-J固体罗氏培养检测,综合影像学、免疫学,以及临床症状确诊结核病患者;病原学阳性患者为痰涂片、痰培养或分子生物学3种技术联合检测,任何一种技术阳性者(分子检测阳性且培养阳性者计入分子检测阳性数,不重复记录在培养阳性患者人数中),获取两类县(区)2018年病原学阳性患者例数,以及3种技术分别检测为阳性的患者例数,并与2015年(尚未推广分子生物学技术)的相关数据进行比较。结果 A类县(区)病原学阳性率从27.8%提高至52.9%,B类县(区)病原学阳性率从33.0%提高至50.6%。两类县(区)2015年与2018年病原学阳性率差异均有统计学意义(χ 2=1270.00,P=0.000; χ 2=860.00,P=0.000);分别比较2015年和2018年两类县(区)的病原学阳性率, 2015年B类县(区)病原学阳性率高于A类县(区),差异有统计学意义(χ 2=80.10,P=0.000);2018年推广分子生物学技术后, A类县(区)病原学阳性率高于B类县(区),差异有统计学意义(χ 2=10.60,P=0.001)。2018年A类县(区)确诊活动性肺结核患者8176例,其中病原学阳性患者4327例(包括涂片3117例、痰培养116例、GeneXpert技术1094例),病原学阳性率为52.9%(涂片38.1%、痰培养1.4%、GeneXpert 13.4%),GeneXpert技术检测阳性占总病原学阳性的比率为25.3%(1094/4327);B类县(区)确诊活动性肺结核患者12196例,其中病原学阳性患者6171例(包括涂片4823例,痰培养461例,恒温扩增技术887例),病原学阳性率分别为50.6%(涂片39.5%,痰培养3.8%,恒温扩增技术7.3%),恒温扩增技术检测阳性占总病原学阳性的比率为14.4%(887/6171)。 结论 GeneXpert技术与恒温扩增技术两种分子生物学检测方法均能在一定程度上提高结核病病原学阳性率,且均快速安全,县(区)级结核病实验室可因地制宜选择适宜的分子生物学检测技术,并加以推广。

关键词: 结核, 分子生物学, 核酸探针, 临床实验室技术, 诊断改善, 评价研究

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of two molecular diagnostic tests (GeneXpert Assay and Isothermal Amplification Technology) on improving the pathogenic positive rate for detection of tuberculosis.Methods Information of active tuberculosis (TB) patients in 23 Counties (Districts) in Jiangsu Province using GeneXpert technology (As Class A) and 46 Counties (Districts) using Isothermal Amplification Technology (As Class B) in 2018 (except for simple pleurisy), and the total number of patients diagnosed as active pulmonary tuberculosis was obtained from China Disease Prevention and Control TB Special Reporting System. The suspected tuberculosis patients from two classes of Counties (Districts) were detected by sputum smear first, and the negative patients were detected by molecular diagnostic test. The L-J solid Roche culture was used simultaneously, and the TB patients were diagnosed by radiography, immunology and clinical symptoms. The pathogenic positive patients means detected by sputum smear, sputum culture or molecular biology,at least one technology positive (molecule detection positive and culture positive patients were included in the positive number of molecule detection, not duplicate record in the number of culture positive patients), obtains the number of pathogenic positive patients from two kinds of counties (districts) in 2018, as well as three kinds of technology positive patients, and compared with 2015 (when the application of molecular biology technology had not yet begun.Results The pathogenic positive rate was increased from 27.8% to 52.9% in the class A and from 33.0% to 50.6% in the class B. There was significant differences in pathogenic positive rates between the two types of Counties (Districts) in 2015 and 2018 (χ 2=1270.00, P=0.000; χ 2=860.00, P=0.000); the pathogenic positive rates of the two classes of Counties (Districts) in 2015 and 2018 were compared, respectively. The pathogenic positive rates of in the class B in 2015 were higher than those of the class A, and the difference was statistically significant. (In 2018, the pathogenic positive rate in the class A was significantly higher than that in the class B (χ 2=10.60, P=0.001). In 2018, 8176 active pulmonary TB patients were diagnosed in the class A. Among them, 4327 were pathogenic positive (including 3117 smears, 116 sputum cultures and 1094 GeneXpert techniques). The pathogenic positive rate was 52.9% (38.1% smears, 1.4% sputum cultures and 13.4% GeneXpert techniques). The positive rate of GeneXpert technique was accounted for 13.4% of the total pathogenic positive cases. The ratio was 25.3% (1094/4327); 12196 patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis were diagnosed in B counties (districts). Among them, 6171 patients (including 4823 smears, 461 sputum cultures and 887 Isothermal Amplification Technology) were pathogenic positive, with 50.6% (39.5% smears, 3.8% sputum cultures and 7.3% Isothermal Amplification Technology), respectively. The positive rate of technical test was 14.4% (887/6171). Conclusion GeneXpert and Isothermal Amplification Technology can improve the pathogenic positive rate of TB to a certain extent, and both of them are fast and safe. The appropriate molecular biological detection technology can be selected and popularized in County (District) level tuberculosis laboratories according to local conditions.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Molecular biology, Nucleic acid probes, Clinical laboratory tests, Quality Improvement, Evaluation studies