多学科分级协作管理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽筛查及干预中的效果评价

doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230122

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨多学科分级协作管理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽筛查及干预的效果。方法: 成立慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽项目多学科管理小组,制订慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽功能筛查、干预流程,以及制定多学科分级协作管理流程、进食管理常规、培训方案和质量控制方案,开展培训并完成考核。于2022年5—10月在中山大学附属第三医院呼吸与危重症医学科实施吞咽筛查及干预并持续质量控制。结果: 共筛查慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者186例,其中,并发吞咽障碍43例,发生率为23.12%(43/186)。实施多学科分级协作管理后,患者吞咽筛查率为100.00%(186/186),吞咽障碍患者根据容积-黏度吞咽测试结果进行干预率为100.00%(43/43),营养吞咽专科护士会诊率为24.19%(45/186),营养医生会诊率为19.89%(37/186),吞咽康复治疗师会诊率为5.91%(11/186)。43例吞咽障碍患者干预后体质量[(61.21±10.99)kg]、血红蛋白[(132.44±11.27)g/L]、血清白蛋白[(37.63±3.51)g/L]、血清前白蛋白水平[(199.77±40.15)mg/L]均高于干预前[分别为(59.99±10.96)kg、(124.67±10.86)g/L、(35.01±2.82)g/L、(177.12±40.09)mg/L](t=-9.871、-8.634、-7.708、-11.703,P值均<0.001);干预后营养风险NRS 2002评分[(2.47±0.74)分]、显性误吸发生率[16.28%(7/43)]、吸入性肺炎发生率[2.33%(1/43)]均低于干预前[分别为(3.53±0.91)分、89.74%(35/39)、35.90%(14/39)](t=10.488,χ²=44.177、0.245,P值均<0.001);干预后专科护理团队临床营养及吞咽理论得分[(86.43±3.80)分]、技能得分[(87.29±2.51)分]均高于干预前[分别为(76.00±6.04)分、(76.76±4.95)分](t=-10.890、-8.584,P值均<0.001)。结论: 对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者常规进行吞咽功能筛查,及早识别并发吞咽障碍患者,进行多学科分级协作管理,可降低患者的营养风险,提升患者进食的安全性,促进专科护理的精细化发展。

关键词: 肺疾病,慢性阻塞性, 吞咽障碍, 干预性研究

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of multi-disciplinary graded collaborative management on swallowing screening and intervention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Data were collected on COPD participants who received swallowing screening and intervention from May to October 2022 in The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Intervention was composed of the followings: (1)A multidisciplinary management team was established. (2)A swallowing function screening and intervention process for patients with COPD was developed. (3)A multidisciplinary graded collaborative management process and feeding management routine were formulated, training program and quality control program were developed. (4) Nurses were trained and assessed. Results: A total of 186 patients with COPD were screened, of whom 43 had swallowing disorders, with a positive rate of 23.12% (43/186). After the implementation of multidisciplinary graded collaborative management, the swallowing screening rate of patients was 100.00% (186/186),the intervention rate of positive patients based on the volumetric viscosity swallowing test results was 100.00% (43/43), the consultation rate of nutrition swallowing specialist nurses was 24.19% (45/186), the consultation rate of nutrition doctors was 19.89% (37/186), and the consultation rate of swallowing rehabilitation therapists was 5.91% (11/186). After intervention, the average body weight ((61.21±10.99) kg), hemoglobin ((132.44±11.27) g/L), serum albumin ((37.63±3.51) g/L) and serum prealbumin ((199.77±40.15) mg/L) of the 43 positive patients were all increased than those before intervention (respectively (59.99±10.96) kg, (124.67±10.86) g/L, (35.01±2.82) g/L, (177.12±40.09) mg/L, (t=-9.871, -8.634, -7.708, -11.703, all P<0.001)); After intervention, the average nutritional risk NRS 2002 score (2.47±0.74), the incidence of dominant aspiration (16.28% (7/43)) and aspiration pneumonia (2.33% (1/43)) were lower than before intervention (respectively (3.53±0.91), 89.74% (35/39), 35.90% (14/39), (t=10.488, χ²=44.177, 0.245, all P<0.001)); After intervention, the average clinical nutrition and swallowing theory scores (86.43±3.80) and skill scores (87.29±2.51) of the specialist nursing team were increased than those before intervention ((76.00±6.04) and (76.76±4.95), respectively, t=-10.890, -8.584, P<0.001). Conclusion: Routine screening of swallowing function in patients with COPD and multi-disciplinary graded collaborative management can reduce the nutritional risk of patients, improve the safety of patients’ feeding and promote the refined development of specialized nursing care.

Key words: Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, Deglutition disorders, Intervention studies

中图分类号:

吴少珠, 於雪英, 罗媛容, 刘燕飞, 柯彩霞. 多学科分级协作管理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽筛查及干预中的效果评价[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(3): 230-235. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230122

Wu Shaozhu, Yu Xueying, Luo Yuanrong, Liu Yanfei, Ke Caixia. The effectiveness of multidisciplinary graded collaborative management on swallowing screening and intervention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2024, 5(3): 230-235. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230122

图/表 4

图1

表1

43例慢性阻塞性肺疾病吞咽障碍患者多学科分级协作管理前后营养情况

项目	干预前	干预后	t值	P值
体质量(kg, $x ˉ$ ±s)	59.99±10.96	61.21±10.99	-9.871	<0.001
NRS 2002评分(分, $x ˉ$ ±s)	3.53±0.91	2.47±0.74	10.488	<0.001
血红蛋白(g/L, $x ˉ$ ±s)	124.67±10.86	132.44±11.27	-8.634	<0.001
血清白蛋白(g/L, $x ˉ$ ±s)	35.01±2.82	37.63±3.51	-7.708	<0.001
血清前白蛋白(mg/L, $x ˉ$ ±s)	177.12±40.09	199.77±40.15	-11.703	<0.001

表1

表2

表3

项目实施前后科室护士营养吞咽理论知识和技能情况

项目	干预前(分, $x ˉ$ ±s)	干预后(分, $x ˉ$ ±s)	t值	P值
吞咽理论知识	76.00±6.04	86.43±3.80	-10.890	<0.001
吞咽护理技能	76.76±4.95	87.29±2.51	-8.584	<0.001

表3

参考文献 30

[1]	窦祖林. 吞咽障碍评估与治疗. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[2]	中国吞咽障碍康复评估与治疗专家共识组. 中国吞咽障碍评估与治疗专家共识(2017年版)第二部分治疗与康复管理篇. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(1):1-10. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.01.001.
[3]	Gonzalez LM, Blom JM, Jennische M, et al. Prevalence of swallowing dysfunction screened in Swedish cohort of COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2017, 12: 331-337. doi:10.2147/COPD.S120207.
[4]	张瑞. 基于结构方程模型的老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽障碍发生现状及其影响因素研究. 银川:宁夏医科大学, 2022.
[5]	李有霞. 放射性核素显像误检测法的完善及食用色素床旁误吸筛查方法的探讨. 广州:广州医科大学, 2017.
[6]	罗敏, 宋佳, 万津, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽障碍的发生现状及影响因素研究. 护理与康复, 2023, 22(4):1-5. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2023.04.001
[7]	张片红, 郭惠兰. 老年患者营养诊疗专家共识. 浙江医学, 2023, 45(2):113-120. doi:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2023.45.2.2022-154.
[8]	Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J, 2019, 53(5):1900164. doi:10.1183/13993003.00164-2019..
[9]	李慧娟, 於雪英, 安德连, 等. 吞咽专科培训后护士核心能力影响因素的调查分析. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2019, 41(12):941-944. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2019.12.015.
[10]	陈亚红. 2022年GOLD慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、治疗、管理及预防全球策略更新要点解读. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(11):1294-1304. doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.01.302.
[11]	姚晓明, 徐秀林. 吞咽功能评估技术研究进展. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2017, 39(1):73-75. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2017.01.021.
[12]	刘延锦, 郭园丽, 王爱霞, 等. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者进食护理. 中华护理学会.T/CNAS 40- 2023.
[13]	王爱平, 张晓春, 王延莉, 等. 老年人误吸的预防. 中华护理学会.T/CNAS 27- 2023.
[14]	万桂芳, 温红梅, 谢纯青, 等. 回顾性分析吞咽障碍患者发生窒息的相关因素及防范措施. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2016, 38(3): 205-208. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2016.03.012.
[15]	佘君, 丁建文, 申捷. 成人吸入性肺炎诊断和治疗专家建议. 国际呼吸杂志, 2022, 42(2): 86-96. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn131368-20211209-00908.
[16]	Oku Y. Swallowing disorder-A possible therapeutic target for preventing COPD exacerbations. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2023,313:104061. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2023.104061.
[17]	张瑞, 常艳, 张晓娜, 等. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽障碍发生现状及影响因素分析. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(23):2898-2904. doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.23.012.
[18]	Chaves Rde D, Carvalho CR, Cukier A, et al. Symptoms of dysphagia in patients with COPD. J Bras Pneumol, 2011, 37(2):176-183. doi:10.1590/s1806-37132011000200007. pmid: 21537653
[19]	Nagami S, Oku Y, Yagi N, et al. Breathing-swallowing discoordination is associated with frequent exacerbations of COPD. BMJ Open Respir Res, 2017, 4(1): e202. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000202.
[20]	张福霞, 李玉玲, 任相峰. 个体化食物稠度饮食干预对脑卒中后伴吞咽障碍患者的影响. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(17):157-159. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.17.058.
[21]	陈琳, 陈云芳. 容积-黏度吞咽测试联合早期个性化饮食干预对降低脑卒中吞咽障碍患者吸入性肺炎发生率的作用. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19(25):120-123. doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.25.037.
[22]	何芬, 谌登红, 李文霞. 基于容积-粘度测试结果实施的进食管理在COPD合并吞咽障碍患者中的应用. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2023, 23(41):206-210. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141.2023.41.040..
[23]	常红, 赵洁, 张诗涵, 等. 量化食物稠度对减少脑卒中吞咽障碍患者误吸的效果评价. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(1):32-35. doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.01.006.
[24]	Lakshminarayan K, Tsai AW, Tong X, et al. Utility of dysphagia screening results in predicting poststroke pneumonia. Stroke, 2010, 41(12):2849-2854. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597039. pmid: 20947835
[25]	冯向侃, 张瑞, 张晓娜, 等. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并吞咽障碍患者的衰弱现状及其影响因素. 河南医学研究, 2022, 31(1):31-35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2022.01.007.
[26]	Goldfarb M, Lauck S, Webb JG, et al. Malnutrition and Mortality in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation, 2018, 138(20):2202-2211. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033887. pmid: 29976568
[27]	赵京梅, 王永红, 李国翔, 等. 对住院慢阻肺患者营养风险临床调查分析. 临床肺科杂志, 2018, 23(6):1098-1100. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2018.06.032.
[28]	Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, et al. 2017 Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2017, 195(5): 557-582. doi:10.1164/rccm.
[29]	张晓旭, 徐蓓, 顾芬. 呼吸系统疾病患者护理管理的现状、问题及思考. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2023, 4(3):185-188. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230053.
[30]	中国老年医学学会营养与食品安全分会, 中国循证医学中心,《中国循证医学杂志》编辑委员会, 等. 老年吞咽障碍患者家庭营养管理中国专家共识(2018 版). 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18 (6):547-559. doi:10.7507/1672-2531.201805032.

时间	阳性例数	显性误吸[例(发生率,%)]	吸入性肺炎[例(发生率,%)]
2021年11月至2022年4月	39	35(89.74)	14(35.90)
2022年5—10月	43	7(16.28)	1(2.33)
χ²值		44.177	0.245
P值		<0.001	<0.001