结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (6): 496-500.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20220041

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腰大池置管持续引流治疗重症结核性脑膜炎临床分析

孟艺哲, 韩玮欣, 李军霞, 赵立明, 陈颜强, 何红彦()   

  1. 河北省胸科医院神经内科,石家庄 050041
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-10 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2022-12-15
  • 通信作者: 何红彦 E-mail:hhydoctor@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年度河北省医学科学研究课题(20200820)

Clinical analysis of continuous drainage in lumbar cistern for severe tuberculous meningitis

Meng Yizhe, Han Weixin, Li Junxia, Zhao Liming, Chen Yanqiang, He Hongyan()   

  1. Department of Neurology, Hebei Chest Hospital,Shijiazhuang 050041,China
  • Received:2022-03-10 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2022-12-15
  • Contact: He Hongyan E-mail:hhydoctor@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    2020 Hebei Province Medical Science Research Project(20200820)

摘要:

目的: 探讨腰大池置管持续引流联合鞘内注射给药治疗重症结核性脑膜炎(tubercular meningitis,TBM)的临床疗效及其安全性。方法: 回顾性分析 2018 年 8 月1日至2021 年 10月1日河北省胸科医院收治的重症结核性脑膜炎患者 42例,根据是否给予腰大池置管持续引流分为对照组(21例)和治疗组(21例)。对照组采用常规抗结核治疗及鞘内注射药物治疗方法进行治疗;治疗组在常规抗结核治疗及鞘内注射药物治疗基础上,行腰大池置管持续引流术,14d为 1 个疗程。 比较两组治疗前后颅内压恢复时间、意识障碍恢复时间、发热消失时间、头痛消失时间、脑脊液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)下降至正常时间、脑脊液蛋白下降至正常时间、脑脊液中性粒细胞消失时间,并对比两组病亡率。结果: 治疗组平均发热恢复时间为(6.24±4.07)d,对照组为(11.65±3.02)d,治疗组发热恢复时间短于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=-4.403,P<0.01)。治疗组头痛消失时间为4.5(0.5,8.5)d,意识障碍恢复时间为3(0,7)d,脑脊液ADA下降至正常时间为10(0,21)d,脑脊液蛋白下降至正常时间为35(0,99)d,脑脊液中性粒细胞消失时间为33(0,85)d,明显优于对照组的10.5(1.5,19.5)d、29(23,35)d、18(9,27)d、94(0,197)d、100(8,192)d,差异均有统计学意义(Z值分别为33.500、169.000、94.000、 338.500、349.000,P值均<0.05);治疗组颅内压恢复时间为21(0,52)d,对照组为27(19,35)d,治疗组颅内压恢复时间短于对照组,两组比较差异无统计学意义(Z=241.500,P=0.597);治疗组与对照组病亡率均为4.7%(1/21)。结论: 腰大池置管持续引流联合鞘内注射给药治疗重症结核性脑膜炎可以缩短发热时间,促进意识恢复,缩短脑脊液ADA和蛋白恢复时间,缩短脑脊液中性粒细胞消失时间,改善临床症状。

关键词: 引流术, 结核,脑膜, 脑脊液

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of continuous lumbar cistern drainage with intrathecal injection on severe tubercular meningitis patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 42 patients with severe tubercular meningitis admitted to Hebei Chest Hospital from August 1,2018 to October 1, 2021. The patients were divided into control group (n=21) and treatment group (n=21) according to whether continuous drainage of lumbar cistern was given. Control group was given routine anti-tuberculosis treatment and intrathecal injection. For treatment group, continuous lumbar cistern drainage was added, 14 days as one session of treatment. The two groups were compared before and after treatment in terms of recovery time of intracranial pressure, disturbance of consciousness, fever, headache, CSF ADA, CSF protein, and CSF neutrophils. Comparison was also done for mortality rate of control group and treatment group. Results: The average recovery time of fever in the treatment group was (6.24±4.07)d, significantly shorter than the control group ((11.65±3.02)d,t=-4.403, P<0.01). In the treatment group, the time of headache disappearance was 4.5 (0.5,8.5) d, the time of consciousness disorder recovery was 3 (0,7) d, the time of CSF ADA decreased to normal was 10 (0,21) d, the time of CSF protein decreased to normal was 35 (0,99) d, and the time of CSF neutrophil disappearance was 33 (0,85) d, which were all significantly better than the control group (10.5 (1.5,19.5) d, 29 (23,35) d, 18 (9,27) d, 94 (0,197) d and 100 (8,192) d), the differences were all statistically significant (Z=33.500, 169.000, 94.000, 338.500, 349.000, P values all <0.05). The recovery time of intracranial pressure was 21 (0,52) d in the treatment group and 27 (19,35) d in the control group, but difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (Z=241.500, P=0.597). The mortality of both groups was 4.7% (1/21). Conclusion: Continuous lumbar cistern drainage combined with intrathecal injection can shorten the fever time, promote consciousness recovery, shorten the recovery time of CSF ADA and protein, accelerate disappearance of CSF neutrophils, improve clinical symptoms and shorten the length of hospital stay of patients with severe tubercular meningitis.

Key words: Drainage, Tuberculosis, meninges, Cerebrospinal fluid

中图分类号: