结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3): 163-165.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

发光二极管荧光显微镜在痰涂片抗酸杆菌检测中的应用评价

胡培磊,谭云洪,刘丰平,易松林,龙海波,谭笑,陈忠南,龚道方   

  1. 410013 长沙,湖南省结核病防治所检验科
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-28 出版日期:2012-12-20 发布日期:2012-12-20
  • 通信作者: 谭云洪,Email: tanyunhong@163.com

Evaluation of light emitting diodes (LEDs) for the fluorescent microscopic on the detection of acid-fast bacilli in sputa

HU Pei-lei, TAN Yun-hong, LIU Feng-ping, YI Song-lin, LONG Hai-bo, TAN Xiao, CHEN Zhong-nan, GONG Dao-fang   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Hunan Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Changsha, 410013,China
  • Received:2012-05-28 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2012-12-20
  • Contact: TAN Yun-hong,Email:tanyunhong@163.com

摘要: 目的 评价发光二极管荧光显微镜在痰涂片检测抗酸杆菌中的临床应用价值。方法 收集194份于2010年1—4月在湖南省结核病防治所就诊的肺结核可疑症状者的痰标本,每份痰标本均采用BACTEC MGIT 960系统液体培养为金标准,分别采用荧光染色-发光二极管(light-emitting diode,LED)荧光显微镜、萋-尼(Z-N)染色普通光学显微镜进行检测,评价LED荧光显微镜与Z-N普通光学显微镜检测的敏感度和特异度的差异。计数资料比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 68份培养阳性标本中,35份Z-N涂片阳性,45份荧光染色LED阳性,敏感度分别为51.5%(35/68)和66.2%(45/68);122份培养阴性标本中,121份Z-N涂片阴性,119份LED阴性,特异度分别为99.2%(121/122)和97.5%(119/122)。LED比Z-N具有较高的敏感度(χ2=5.78, P<0.05),特异度差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.25, P>0.05)。结论 与普通光学显微镜检测相比,LED荧光显微镜检测具有较高的敏感度和相似的特异度,且成本低廉,易于接受,在结核病高负担且经济不发达的国家具有推广价值。

Abstract: Objective To evaluate of light emitting diodes (LEDs) for the fluorescent microscopic on the detection acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in sputa. Methods 194 sputa were collected from patients with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB who presented to Hunan Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention from January to April 2010, each sputum was detected by LED and Ziehl-Neelsen (Z-N) staining with liquid culture as a gold standard, the sensitivities and specificities of LED and Z-N were also evaluated. Comparative analysis was done with χ2 test, and P<0.05 was regarded as significant. Results Of 68 culture-positive specimens, 35 specimens were Z-N positive and 45 specimens were LED positive. The sensitivities of Z-N and LED were 51.5% (35/68) and 66.2% (45/68), respectively. Of 122 culture-negative specimens, 121 specimens were Z-N negative and 119 specimens were LED negative. The specificities of Z-N and LED were 99.2% (121/122) and 97.5% (119/122), respectively. The sensitivity had significant difference between Z-N and LED (χ2=5.78, P<0.05), and the specificity had no significant difference (χ2=0.25, P>0.05). Conclusion LED has higher sensitivity and similar specificity compared with Z-N, is low cost and user -friendliness. LED have more potential to be used widely in low-income and high burden countries.