结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2): 109-112.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2015.02.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CT引导下经支气管镜针吸活检术诊断纵隔和肺门周围肿块的效果分析

杨贤明,陈伟生,翁加豪,郑绍廷,陈铭华   

  1. 515073 广东省汕头市第三人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-26 出版日期:2015-06-14 发布日期:2015-06-14
  • 通信作者: 杨贤明, Email:styxm@21cn.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省汕头市2011年科技重点攻关项目 [汕府科(2011)46号]

Application of transbronchial needle aspiration under CT-guided in diagnosing mediastinal mass and pulmonary hilar mass

YANG Xian-ming, CHEN Wei-sheng, WENG Jia-hao, ZHENG Shao-ting, CHEN Ming-hua   

  1. The Third People’s Hospital, Shantou City, Guangdong,Shantou 515073,China
  • Received:2015-03-26 Online:2015-06-14 Published:2015-06-14
  • Contact: YANG Xian-ming, Email: styxm@21cn.com

摘要: 目的 探讨CT引导下经支气管镜针吸活检术对纵隔和肺门周围肿块的诊断效果。方法 选择140例行CT检查发现纵隔和肺门周围肿块的患者,在患者知情同意的情况下,采用随机号码表法将所有患者分为观察组(70例)和对照组(70例)。观察组在CT实时引导下行经支气管镜针吸活检术,对照组则采用盲探法行经支气管镜针吸活检术。记录两组的阳性例数、假阳性例数、阴性例数和假阴性例数,并计算两种方法的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。记录两组患者不良反应发生率。计数资料采用χ2检验;以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 观察组检出恶性肿瘤40例,良性肿瘤1例,结核病13例,结节病2例,正常组织14例;而对照组则检出恶性肿瘤38例,良性肿瘤2例,结核病11例,结节病3例,正常组织16例;两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2值分别为0.029、0.000、0.050、0.000和0.042, P值分别为0.734、1.000、0.823、1.000和0.837)。观察组假阴性患者(1例)较对照组的(7例)更少(χ2=4.275, P=0.039);观察组的阳性患者(65例)与对照组(59例)相当(χ2=1.764, P=0.184);观察组的阴性患者(3例)与对照组(2例)相当(χ2=0.000, P=1.000);观察组的假阳性患者(1例)与对照组(2例)相当(χ2=0.000, P=1.000)。对照组的敏感度为89.39%、特异度为50.00%、阳性预测值为96.72%、阴性预测值为22.22%;观察组的敏感度为98.48%、特异度为75.00%、阳性预测值为98.48%、阴性预测值为75.00%。观察组发生纵隔气肿或气胸0例, 而对照组发生纵隔气肿或气胸6例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.353, P=0.037);观察组发生穿刺点出血1例,而对照组发生穿刺点出血8例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.275, P=0.039)。结论 CT实时引导下行纤维支气管镜针吸活检术诊断纵隔和肺门周围肿块效果更好,不良反应更少。

Abstract: Objective To investigate the diagnosis effect of transbronchial needle aspiration under CT-guided for mediastinal mass and pulmonary hilar mass.Methods One hundred and forty patients underwent mediastinal mass and pulmonary hilar mass were randomly divided into either observation group (n=70) or control group (n=70) by random number table method after signing informed consent. In the observation group, transbronchial needle aspiration was carried out under real-time CT guidance. In the control group, transbronchial needle aspiration was carried out without CT guidance. The number of positive patients, false positive patients, negative patients and false negative patients were recorded in both groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated in both groups. The incidence of complication was also recorded in both groups. For enumeration data, χ2 test was applied to test significance. A P-value less than 0.05 was deemed significant.Results Forty patients with malignant tumor, 1 benign tumor, 13 tuberculosis, 2 sarcoidosis and 14 normal tissues were identified in the observation group. Thirty-eight patients with malignant tumor, 2 benign tumor, 11 tuberculosis, 3 sarcoidosis and 16 normal patients were found in the control group. There was no difference between two groups (The χ2 values were respectively 0.029, 0.000, 0.050, 0.000 and 0.042. The P-values were respectively 0.734, 1.000, 0.823 1.000 and 0.837). The false negative patients (1 case) in the observation group were less than those (7 case) in the control group (χ2=4.275, P=0.039). The number of the positive patients (65 case) in the observation group were similar to those in (59 case) the control group (χ2=1.764, P=0.184). The number of the false positive patients (1 case) in the observation group were similar to those in (2 case) the control group (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). The number of the negative patients (3 case) in the observation group were similar to those in (2 case) the control group (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the observation group were 98.48%, 75.00%, 98.48%, and 75.00%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the control group were 89.39%, 50.00%, 96.72%, and 22.22%, respectively. There was not mediastinal emphysema or pneumothorax patient in the observation group, but six mediastinal emphysema or pneumothorax patients in the control group. There was significant difference between two groups (χ2=4.353, P=0.037). There was one hemorrhage patient in the observation group, but eight hemorrhage patients in the control group. There was significant difference between two groups (χ2=4.275, P=0.039).Conclusion Transbronchial needle aspiration under CT is more effective for diagnosing mediastinal mass and pulmonary hilar mass and its complication is less.