结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1): 56-59.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2014.01.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖南桃源县与涂阳肺结核患者密切接触者的肺结核检出率分析

宋江林,林秋娥,华伟湘   

  1. 415700 湖南省桃源县疾病预防控制中心结核病防治科(宋江林)、办公室(林秋娥);湖南省常德市疾病预防控制中心结核病防治科(华伟湘)
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-04 出版日期:2014-03-30 发布日期:2014-03-30
  • 通信作者: 宋江林, Email:jianglins2009@163.com

The analysis of case detection rate among close contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Taoyuan county

SONG Jiang-lin, LIN Qiu-e,HUA Wei-xiang   

  1. Taoyuan County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taoyuan, Hu’nan 415700,China
  • Received:2013-09-04 Online:2014-03-30 Published:2014-03-30
  • Contact: SONG Jiang-lin,Email: jianglins2009@163.com

摘要: 目的探讨与涂阳肺结核患者密切接触者(简称“密切接触者”)中检出肺结核的情况,为今后的早期发现工作提供参考。方法桃源县2009—2012年结核病门诊就诊16145人次,其中密切接触者5121名,占31.72%。分类型、年龄、性别、有无症状、痰涂片结果等情况,采用Excel表进行描述性统计分析,对各组率的比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果在与涂阳肺结核患者密切接触者中,共检出肺结核患者58例,总检出率1.13%(58/5121),年度检出率0.75%~1.69%。其中在家属中检查出患者24例,检出率0.59%(24/4079),非家属中检查出34例,检出率3.26%(34/1042),其差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.967,P<0.01)。在检出的58例患者中,痰涂阳患者27例,占46.55%(27/58),涂阴患者31例,占53.45%(31/58),差异没有统计学意义(χ2=1.210, P>0.05)。分年龄组看,20岁以下密切接触者中未检出肺结核患者,20~岁组检出率0.66%(11/1666),40~岁组检出率0.76%(16/2117),60岁以上老年人检出率最高,为3.23%(31/960),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=47.747, P<0.01)。从性别来看,男性检出率1.85%(47/2543),女性0.43%(11/2578),差异没有统计学意义(χ2=1.011,P>0.05)。从密切接触者检查结果来看,在无症状和有症状者中分别检出肺结核患者2例和56例,检出率分别为0.04%(2/4676)和12.58%[(27+29)/445],两者差异有统计学意义(χ2=1101.950,P<0.01)。结论通过广泛宣传国家结核病防治政策,开展密切接触者等重点人群检查,有助于肺结核患者被早期发现,达到早期诊断、早期规则治疗,以及降低疫情、保护健康的目的。

Abstract: Objective To analyze case detection rate among close contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients, and to provide suggestions for future early case detection work.Methods Among 16145 people consulting for TB clinic, 5121 were close contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients from 2009 to 2012 in Taoyuan County. And we made descriptive analysis on type, age, sex, symptoms, sputum smear results of these close contacts.Results Among the 5121 close contacts, a total of 58 tuberculosis patients were detected with the detection rate of 1.13% (58/5121), and the annual rate of 0.75%-1.69%. 24 of them were checked out from family members(the detection rate is 0.59%(24/4079)),and the checking out rate among none-family members is 3.26%(34/1042), and the difference is statistically significant(χ2=14.967,P<0.01). The smear positive rate accounted for 46.55% (27/58) and 53.45% (31/58) for smear negative, and the difference is not statistically significant (χ2=1.210,P>0.05). In terms of age group, no one was checked out among those under the age of 20 and highest among those over 60(3.23%(31/960)), and the difference is statistically significant(χ2=47.747,P<0.01). In terms of gender, the detection rate is 1.85% (47/2543) among males and 0.43% (11/2578) among those females, and the difference is not statistically significant (χ2=1.011,P>0.05). As for whether with suspected symptoms, the rate is 0.04%(2/4676) among those without any symptoms and 12.58%((27+29)/445) among those with suspected symptom, and the difference is statistically significant(χ2=1101.950,P<0.01).Conclusion Extensive publication of national tuberculosis prevention and control policies, close contacts and other key people check, will benefit the early detection of tuberculosis patients and reducing the epidemic.