Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease ›› 2023, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (5): 376-382.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230050
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yang Chao(), Wang Jing(
), Xie Ke, Tang Guilin
Received:
2023-03-27
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-10-16
Contact:
Yang Chao,Email:CLC Number:
Yang Chao, Wang Jing, Xie Ke, Tang Guilin. Analysis of the treatment outcome and influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in floating population in Tongzhou District of Beijing, 2012—2021[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease , 2023, 4(5): 376-382. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230050
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jtbld.cn/EN/10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230050
序号 | 变量 | 赋值 |
---|---|---|
X1 | 性别 | 1=男性;2=女性 |
X2 | 年龄 | 1≤24岁;2=25~44岁;3=45~64岁;4≥65岁 |
X3 | 民族 | 1=汉族;2=少数民族 |
X4 | 患者来源 | 1=主动发现;2=被动发现 |
X5 | 病原学结果 | 1=病原学阳性;2=病原学阴性;3=无病原学结果 |
X6 | 治疗分类 | 1=初治;2=复治 |
X7 | 使用FDC | 1=是;2=否 |
X8 | 首诊断单位 | 1=北京市通州区疾病预防控制中心;2=首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院;3=其他(北京市结核病控制研究所、中国人民解放军总医院第八医学中心、北京市大兴区疾病预防控制中心、北京市丰台区疾病预防控制中心、首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院等) |
Y | 治疗转归 | 0=不良结局;1=成功治疗 |
年份 | 常住 人口数 (万) | 患者 总例数 | 登记率 (/10万) | 户籍患者 | 流动人口患者 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
户籍人口 数(万) | 例数 | 登记率 (/10万) | 百分比 (%) | 流动人口 数(万) | 例数 | 登记率 (/10万) | 百分比 (%) | ||||
2012 | 129.2 | 337 | 26.08 | 68.3 | 127 | 18.59 | 37.69 | 60.9 | 210 | 34.48 | 62.31 |
2013 | 132.9 | 160 | 12.04 | 69.3 | 71 | 10.25 | 44.38 | 63.6 | 89 | 13.99 | 55.62 |
2014 | 136.5 | 225 | 16.48 | 70.5 | 77 | 10.92 | 34.22 | 66.0 | 148 | 22.42 | 65.78 |
2015 | 139.4 | 572 | 41.03 | 71.8 | 213 | 29.67 | 37.24 | 67.6 | 359 | 53.11 | 62.76 |
2016 | 145.9 | 690 | 47.29 | 74.7 | 246 | 32.93 | 35.65 | 71.2 | 444 | 62.36 | 64.35 |
2017 | 154.5 | 745 | 48.22 | 76.9 | 291 | 37.84 | 39.06 | 77.6 | 454 | 58.51 | 60.94 |
2018 | 163.3 | 691 | 42.31 | 78.7 | 245 | 31.13 | 35.46 | 84.6 | 446 | 52.72 | 64.54 |
2019 | 173.2 | 557 | 32.16 | 80.8 | 182 | 22.52 | 32.68 | 92.4 | 375 | 40.58 | 67.32 |
2020 | 184.0 | 453 | 24.62 | 82.0 | 157 | 19.15 | 34.66 | 102.0 | 296 | 29.02 | 65.34 |
2021 | 184.3 | 566 | 30.71 | 83.5 | 185 | 22.16 | 32.69 | 100.8 | 381 | 37.80 | 67.31 |
合计 | 1543.2 | 4996 | 32.37 | 756.5 | 1794 | 23.71 | 35.91 | 786.7 | 3202 | 40.70 | 64.09 |
年份 | 患者 例数 | 治疗成 功例数 | 治疗成功 率(%) | 不同性别成功治疗率 | 不同年龄组成功治疗率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 | 女性 | ≤24岁 | 25~44岁 | 45~64岁 | ≥65岁 | ||||
2012 | 210 | 207 | 98.57 | 99.31(143/144) | 96.97(64/66) | 98.57(69/70) | 99.15(116/117) | 100.00(21/21) | 1/2 |
2013 | 89 | 87 | 97.75 | 96.83(61/63) | 100.00(26/26) | 96.88(31/32) | 100.00(45/45) | 100.00(10/10) | 1/2 |
2014 | 148 | 133 | 89.86 | 88.54(85/96) | 92.31(48/52) | 88.89(32/36) | 93.26(83/89) | 70.59(12/17) | 6/6 |
2015 | 359 | 337 | 93.87 | 92.17(200/217) | 96.48(137/142) | 95.65(88/92) | 94.63(194/205) | 89.59(43/48) | 85.71(12/14) |
2016 | 444 | 407 | 91.67 | 90.20(267/296) | 94.59(140/148) | 95.80(114/119) | 91.96(206/224) | 87.01(67/77) | 83.33(20/24) |
2017 | 454 | 439 | 96.70 | 96.19(278/289) | 97.58(161/165) | 98.44(126/128) | 98.31(232/236) | 91.78(67/73) | 82.35(14/17) |
2018 | 446 | 416 | 93.27 | 92.39(255/276) | 94.71(161/170) | 97.25(106/109) | 93.57(233/249) | 87.88(58/66) | 86.36(19/22) |
2019 | 375 | 353 | 94.13 | 92.74(230/248) | 96.85(123/127) | 92.50(74/80) | 95.26(201/211) | 93.33(56/60) | 91.67(22/24) |
2020 | 296 | 279 | 94.26 | 92.49(160/173) | 96.75(119/123) | 98.28(57/58) | 94.15(161/171) | 91.49(43/47) | 90.00(18/20) |
2021 | 381 | 364 | 95.54 | 94.51(224/237) | 97.22(140/144) | 96.61(57/59) | 95.75(203/212) | 97.01(65/67) | 90.70(39/43) |
0.003 | 0.039 | 6.425 | |||||||
P值 | 0.957 | 0.844 | 0.011 |
因素 | 全部患者 (3202例) | 成功治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
是(3022例) | 否(180例) | ||||||||
性别 | 11.631 | 0.001 | |||||||
男性 | 2039(63.68) | 1903(93.33) | 136(6.67) | ||||||
女性 | 1163(36.32) | 1119(96.22) | 44(3.78) | ||||||
年龄组(岁) | 34.455 | 0.000 | |||||||
≤24 | 783(24.45) | 754(96.30) | 29(3.70) | ||||||
25~44 | 1759(54.93) | 1674(95.17) | 85(4.83) | ||||||
45~64 | 486(15.18) | 442(90.95) | 44(9.05) | ||||||
≥65 | 174(5.44) | 152(87.36) | 22(12.64) | ||||||
民族 | 26.196 | 0.000 | |||||||
汉族 | 2870(89.63) | 2729(95.09) | 141(4.91) | ||||||
少数民族 | 332(10.37) | 293(88.25) | 39(11.75) | ||||||
职业 | 6.670 | 0.154 | |||||||
教师/学生/儿童 | 143(4.47) | 138(96.50) | 5(3.50) | ||||||
医务人员/干部职员 | 394(12.31) | 378(95.94) | 16(4.06) | ||||||
餐饮食品业/公共场所服务员/商业服务 | 351(10.96) | 337(96.01) | 14(3.99) | ||||||
离退人员/家务及待业/不详 | 1506(47.03) | 1413(93.82) | 93(6.18) | ||||||
工人/农民/民工/牧民/长途驾驶员 | 808(25.23) | 756(93.56) | 52(6.44) | ||||||
患者来源 | 8.527 | 0.004 | |||||||
主动发现 | 516(16.11) | 473(91.67) | 43(8.33) | ||||||
被动发现 | 2686(83.89) | 2549(94.90) | 137(5.10) | ||||||
病原学结果 | 26.420 | 0.000 | |||||||
病原学阳性 | 1144(35.73) | 1062(92.83) | 82(7.17) | ||||||
病原学阴性 | 1745(54.50) | 1678(96.16) | 67(3.84) | ||||||
无病原学结果 | 313(9.77) | 282(90.10) | 31(9.90) | ||||||
治疗分类 | 5.991 | 0.014 | |||||||
初治 | 3067(95.78) | 2901(94.59) | 166(5.41) | ||||||
复治 | 135(4.22) | 121(89.63) | 14(10.37) | ||||||
合并糖尿病 | 0.244 | 0.621 | |||||||
是 | 88(2.75) | 82(93.18) | 6(6.82) | ||||||
否 | 3114(97.25) | 2940(94.41) | 174(5.59) | ||||||
合并肺外结核a | 1.522 | 0.217 | |||||||
是 | 323(10.09) | 300(92.88) | 23(7.12) | ||||||
否 | 2879(89.91) | 2722(94.55) | 157(5.45) | ||||||
使用FDC | 23.610 | 0.000 | |||||||
是 | 854(26.67) | 834(97.66) | 20(2.34) | ||||||
否 | 2348(73.33) | 2188(93.19) | 160(6.81) | ||||||
首诊断单位 | 26.576 | 0.000 | |||||||
北京市通州区疾病预防控制中心 | 2023(63.18) | 1922(95.01) | 101(4.99) | ||||||
首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院 | 1165(36.38) | 1091(93.65) | 74(6.35) | ||||||
其他b | 14(0.44) | 9(64.29) | 5(35.71) |
变量 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常数项 | -1.673 | 0.795 | 4.423 | 0.035 | 0.188 | |
女性 | -0.641 | 0.182 | 12.413 | 0.000 | 0.527 | 0.369~0.752 |
年龄 | 24.935 | 0.000 | ||||
≤24岁 | 参照 | |||||
25~44岁 | 1.177 | 0.309 | 14.495 | 0.000 | 3.246 | 1.771~5.951 |
45~64岁 | 0.946 | 0.265 | 12.723 | 0.000 | 2.575 | 1.531~4.329 |
≥65岁 | 0.291 | 0.287 | 1.026 | 0.311 | 1.338 | 0.762~2.350 |
少数民族 | 1.001 | 0.246 | 16.533 | 0.000 | 2.720 | 1.679~4.406 |
被动发现 | -0.130 | 0.243 | 0.284 | 0.594 | 0.878 | 0.545~1.415 |
病原学结果 | 14.413 | 0.001 | ||||
病原学阳性 | 参照 | |||||
病原学阴性 | 0.170 | 0.243 | 0.489 | 0.484 | 1.185 | 0.736~1.909 |
无病原学结果 | 0.735 | 0.244 | 9.098 | 0.003 | 2.085 | 1.239~3.360 |
复治 | 0.597 | 0.312 | 3.668 | 0.055 | 1.816 | 0.986~3.344 |
未使用FDC | 0.765 | 0.264 | 8.380 | 0.004 | 2.148 | 1.280~3.605 |
首诊单位 | 14.950 | 0.001 | ||||
北京市通州区疾病预防控制中心 | 参照 | |||||
首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院 | 2.309 | 0.599 | 14.872 | 0.000 | 10.068 | 3.113~32.558 |
其他a | 2.140 | 0.605 | 12.491 | 0.000 | 8.499 | 2.594~27.844 |
[1] | GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories,1990—2019:a systematic and analysis for the Global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet,2020, 396(10258):1204-1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. |
[2] | 谭卫国, 管红云, 吴清芳, 等. 流动人口结核病防控创新策略与实施效果. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2020, 5(3):145-149. doi:0510.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2020.03.001. |
[3] | 苏倩, 刘英. 2010—2017年重庆市流动人口新涂阳肺结核患者流行病学特征分析. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(8):1349-1352,1363. |
[4] | 张黎明. 结核病分级诊疗和综合防治服务模式在结核病防治中的效果探讨. 智慧健康, 2021, 7(13):29-31. doi:10.19335/icnki.2096-1219.2021.13.009. |
[5] | World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis: guide lines for national programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997. |
[6] | 赖铿, 江坤洪, 谢玮, 等. 2014—2020年广州市流动人口肺结核流行特征分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(8):98-105. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021,08,008. |
[7] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288—2017肺结核诊断.2017-11-09. |
[8] | 孙闪华, 李艳圆, 许琰, 等. 2016—2021年北京市报告肺结核患者流动就诊情况分析. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(11):1746-1752. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220522-00446. |
[9] | 张芳, 王玉兰, 刘晶磊. 2008—2017年北京市东城区流动人口结核病登记治疗管理情况分析. 预防医学情报杂志, 2020, 36(4):462-467. |
[10] | 杨超, 王晶, 谢珂, 等. 2012—2021年北京市通州区病原学阳性肺结核流行特征及治疗转归分析. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2023, 4(2):128-134. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20230031. |
[11] | 杨超, 王晶, 唐桂林, 等. 2016—2020年北京市通州区病原学阴性肺结核流行特征及治疗转归分析. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(6):477-482. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20220149. |
[12] | 王更新, 刘天军, 张曦月. 北京市房山区肺结核患者治疗影响因素分析. 职业卫生与病伤, 2021, 36(4):222-225. |
[13] | 陈翠华. 影响肺结核患者治疗转归的因素与预防措施. 中国卫生标准管理, 2017, 8(8):20-21. |
[14] | 吴妍, 李琦. 老年肺结核的诊治现状与进展. 中国防痨杂志, 2015, 37(9):975-978. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2015.05.013. |
[15] | 张亚敬, 姜影, 孙浩, 等. 154例老年肺结核患者的发现与治疗转归情况分析. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2023, 4(1):48-53. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20220158. |
[16] | 孙冬梅. 影响老年肺结核患者化疗依从性相关因素及干预措施. 护理实践与研究, 2013, 10(5):7-9. |
[17] | 马艳, 黄麦玲, 杜建, 等. ≥65岁与<65岁肺结核患者治疗效果的对比分析. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2018, 7(1):54-59. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2018.01.012. |
[18] | 申晨, 申阿东. 结核病发病率的性别差异性研究现状. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017, 6(4):381-385. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.04.018. |
[19] | 杨智琪, 胡屹, 赵琦, 等. 徐州市两县和乌鲁木齐市涂阳肺结核患者疗效及其影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2018, 40(1):98-105. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018,12,022. |
[20] | 闫银锁, 许琰, 倪新兰, 等. 肺结核患者治疗结局影响因素多水平模型分析. 中国卫生统计, 2021, 38(1):25-27. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.20221.01.007. |
[21] | 郭强, 李瑞萍, 马玉宝, 等. 2018—2020年甘肃省利福平敏感肺结核患者治疗不良结局的随机效应logistic模型分析. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(6):455-462. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20220111. |
[22] | 尤媛媛, 张国龙, 陈裕. 120例初治耐多药肺结核患者治疗依从性的影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(3): 249-254. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.03.013. |
[23] | 孙赫璘. 2014—2019年吉林省结核病时间序列分析及耐药结核病流行特征. 长春:吉林大学, 2021. doi:10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin.2021.003025. |
[24] | 张斯钰, 白丽琼, 谭红专, 等. 初治涂阳肺结核患者服用固定剂量复合制剂与板式组合药的疗效比较. 中国防痨杂志, 2011, 33(10):655-658. |
[25] | 张雁, 张进国, 房登楼, 等. 抗结核药物固定剂量复合制剂隔日疗法临床效果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2014, 36(1):41-45. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.01.009. |
[1] | Ma Jianjun, Zhang Tiejuan, Zhao Qinglong, Yu Shihui, Mei Yang. Random forest algorithm-based study of risk factors for tuberculosis incidence in an elderly mobile population [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(5): 364-369. |
[2] | Yang Liangzi, Wang Yuxiang, Tan Jie, Zheng Junfeng, Fu Liang, Deng Guofang, Zhang Peize. Analysis of influencing factors of delayed negative conversion of sputum bacteria in drug sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis patients with diabetes during intensive treatment [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(5): 370-375. |
[3] | Zhang Ying, Lao Haijun, Lin Bing, Liu Junting, Sun Dongmei. Analysis of diagnosis and treatment of 76 cases of chronic tuberculous empyema treated by complete thoracoscopy with process optimization method [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(4): 308-312. |
[4] | Zhou Lin, Liu Eryong, Zhao Yanlin. Select appropriate treatment plan and correctly evaluate the efficacy of anti-tuberculosis treatment, improving the treatment quality of rifampicin sensitive tuberculosis [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(3): 189-193. |
[5] | Yang Chao, Wang Jing, Xie Ke, Tang Guilin, Gao Hanqing, Wang Bin. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of pulmonary tuberculosis with positive etiology in Tongzhou, Beijing from 2012 to 2021 [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(2): 128-134. |
[6] | Zhang Yajing, Jiang Ying, Sun Hao, Tang Guiqin, Zhao Ying. Analysis of detection and treatment prognosis of 154 elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2023, 4(1): 48-53. |
[7] | Guo Qiang, Li Ruiping, Ma Yubao, Zhang Lan, Yang Shumin. Analysis of treatment adverse outcomes for rifampicin sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis patients with random effects logistic model in Gansu Province from 2018 to 2020 [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(6): 455-462. |
[8] | Huang Yao, Fan Yuzheng, Wang Xiangyu, Zhong Tao, Zhang Jie, Yang Nansen, Li Shengbin, Ye Xuetian, Liu Shengyuan. Analysis of management and treatment effects of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, 2011—2020 [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(6): 463-468. |
[9] | Chen Zidan, Mao Ling. Clinical analysis of 28 cases of artificial stone associated silicosis complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria disease [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(5): 388-393. |
[10] | Dong Zhaoliang, Yao Liming, Li Lingdi, Wang Lianbo, Yao Xiaowei, Li Zhuo, Liu Fengsheng, Jia Chenguang. Clinical efficacy of conservative treatment for mild spinal tuberculosis [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(4): 281-286. |
[11] | Li Yishuai, Qin Xuebo, Li Xianglan, Wei Lan, Duan Xiaoliang, Zhang Lei, Chen Liang, Li Jianhang. Analysis of effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy in the treatment of refractory cavity pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(4): 292-295. |
[12] | WEI Jian-hua, GUO Tao, GAO Xiao-na, WU Wei, GUO Lei. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of 151 hospitalized students with tuberculosis [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2021, 2(4): 330-335. |
[13] | LIAO Xiao-qin, LIN Jian-dong, WU Di, CHEN Xiao-hong. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of Mycobacterium avian complex pulmonary disease and the risk factors of treatment effect [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2021, 2(2): 120-124. |
[14] | ZHANG Hong-wei, SUN Shan-hua, GAO Zhi-dong, XU Yan, TAO Li-ying, CHEN Xi. Treatment and outcomes of rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in Beijing, 2016—2020 [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2021, 2(2): 164-168. |
[15] | GUO Qian, SHEN Chen. The progress of non-tuberculous mycobacterium disease in children [J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2021, 2(2): 184-188. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||