结核与肺部疾病杂志  2026, Vol. 7 Issue (5): 564-567    DOI: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20260154

• 标准解读 • 上一篇    下一篇

《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(2026年版)修订要点解读

赵皎洁, 高静韬()   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所临床试验机构管理办公室, 北京 101149
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-21 出版日期:2026-10-20 发布日期:2026-06-29
  • 通信作者: 高静韬 E-mail:jingtaogao88@126.com

Interpretation of key revisions in Good Clinical Practice (2026 version)

Zhao Jiaojie, Gao Jingtao()   

  1. Clinical Trial Administration Office, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing 101149, China
  • Received:2026-06-21 Online:2026-10-20 Published:2026-06-29
  • Contact: Gao Jingtao E-mail:jingtaogao88@126.com

摘要:

2026年版《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(Good Clinical Practice,GCP;以下简称“2026版GCP”)正式发布并即将实施,本次修订全面对标国际人用药品技术要求协调理事会(The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use,ICH)于2025年1月发布的《E6(R3):药物临床试验质量管理规范技术指导原则》的指导原则,立足国内临床试验行业发展现状与现存痛点,完成制度体系结构性重构。2026版GCP规范精简原有冗余条款,增设独立数据治理章节,确立“质量源于设计、风险相称、符合目的”三大核心理念,进一步明晰申办者与主要研究者的双重终身责任。本文结合2026版GCP原文、国际监管动态及行业统计数据,系统梳理本次修订的政策背景,深度解读各项核心变革内容,并分析2026版GCP对行业格局、合规体系、国际化发展带来的影响,同时,从企业、机构、行业监管等维度提出适配建议,以期为国内临床试验从业主体合规转型、行业高质量发展提供参考与借鉴。

关键词: 临床试验, 药物评价, 规范, 评论

Abstract:

The 2026 version of Good Clinical Practice (GCP, hereinafter referred to as the 2026 GCP) has been officially released and is pending implementation. Fully aligned with E6(R3): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice issued by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) in January 2025, this revision structurally reconstructs the institutional framework based on the current development status and existing pain points of China’s clinical trial industry. The 2026 GCP streamlines redundant provisions from previous editions and adds an independent chapter on data governance. It establishes three core philosophies, namely “quality by design”, “proportionate risk management” and “fit-for-purpose”, and further clarifies the lifelong shared liabilities of sponsors and principal investigators. Combining the original text of the 2026 GCP, international regulatory updates and industrial statistical data, this paper systematically sorts out the policy background of this revision and provides an in-depth interpretation of all core revisions. It also analyzes the impacts of the 2026 GCP on industrial landscape, compliance systems and internationalization. Furthermore, adaptive suggestions are proposed from the perspectives of pharmaceutical enterprises, clinical trial institutions and industrial regulators, so as to provide references for domestic clinical trial stakeholders to achieve compliant transformation and advance high-quality development of the industry.

Key words: Clinical trial, Drug evaluation, Benchmarking, Comment

中图分类号: