结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 179-185.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20250199

• 论著 • 上一篇    

基于决策树Markov模型的非吸烟女性肺癌筛查卫生经济学分析

刘玲丽1,2, 杨亚蕊2, 覃紫菱2,3, 郭旭君2, 钟涛2, 范玉铮2, 何娟2, 刘俊1(), 徐明明4(), 刘盛元1,2()   

  1. 1 遵义医科大学公共卫生学院, 遵义 563006
    2 深圳市南山区慢性病防治院呼吸与结核病防治科, 深圳 518064
    3 深圳大学医学部公共卫生学院, 深圳 518055
    4 中山大学公共卫生学院, 深圳 518107
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-17 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-04-13
  • 通信作者: 刘俊,徐明明,刘盛元 E-mail:7829337@qq.com;xumm27@mail.sysu.edu.cn;liushenglb@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    癌症、心脑血管、呼吸和代谢性疾病防治研究国家科技重大专项(2024ZD0524800);癌症、心脑血管、呼吸和代谢性疾病防治研究国家科技重大专项(2024ZD0524804);南山区科技计划项目(医疗卫生类)[NS2025015(重点)];南山区科技计划项目(医疗卫生类)[NS2024036];广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2023158);广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(C2023106);南山区区级医学重点学科建设项目

Health economics analysis of lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in non-smoking women based on a decision tree-Markov model

Liu Lingli1,2, Yang Yarui2, Qin Ziling2,3, Guo Xujun2, Zhong Tao2, Fan Yuzheng2, He Juan2, Liu Jun1(), Xu Mingming4(), Liu Shengyuan1,2()   

  1. 1 School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, China
    2 Department of Respiratory and Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Nanshan District Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Institute, Shenzhen 518064, China
    3 School of Public Health, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen 518055, China
    4 School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
  • Received:2025-12-17 Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-04-13
  • Contact: Liu Jun,Xu Mingming,Liu Shengyuan E-mail:7829337@qq.com;xumm27@mail.sysu.edu.cn;liushenglb@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Cancer, Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular, Respiratory, and Metabolic Disease Prevention and Treatment Research(2024ZD0524800);National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Cancer, Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular, Respiratory, and Metabolic Disease Prevention and Treatment Research(2024ZD0524804);Nanshan District Science and Technology Program (Medical and Health Category)(NS2025015, Key Program);Nanshan District Science and Technology Program (Medical and Health Category)(NS2024036);Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund Project(A2023158);Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund Project(C2023106);Nanshan District Medical Key Discipline Construction Funding

摘要:

目的: 基于决策树Markov模型评价非吸烟女性肺癌筛查策略的卫生经济学价值,以明确最优筛查策略并指导制定肺癌筛查策略。方法: 采用TreeAge Pro 2022软件模拟构建50~74岁非吸烟女性肺癌筛查策略决策树Markov模型,模型需要的相关参数包括流行病学数据(发病率、死亡率)、疾病转移概率、筛查诊断性能参数(筛查方式、筛查起始年龄、筛查间隔时间)、成本与健康效用值等,分别来源于中国肿瘤登记年报、中国人口普查年鉴2020、2018中国成人烟草调查报告、国内外公开发表的高质量文献,再对接受不同低剂量螺旋CT(LDCT)筛查策略者(筛查组)和未接受任何肺癌筛查者(未筛查组)各模拟10万名,并开展成本效用分析[包括2021年国民生产总值(GDP)、自愿支付(WTP)、增量成本效用比(ICUR)、质量调整寿命年(QALY)和寿命年(LY)等指标]和敏感性分析。结果: 在肺癌筛查策略中,12种单一LDCT筛查策略产生的人均成本(范围为3355.64~10761.40元)均高于12种肺癌风险定量预测模型(NCC-LCm2021模型)联合LDCT筛查的人均成本(范围为1580.48~3287.68元),以50~74岁人群1年1次单一LDCT筛查策略的人均成本为最高(10761.40元),以60~74岁人群中每5年进行1次NCC-LCm2021模型联合LDCT筛查策略的人均成本为最低(1580.48元)。当以2021年3倍人均GDP(242928元)为WTP阈值时,各筛查策略均具有成本效用优势[ICUR值范围为(69965.507~158106.667)元/QALY],以50~74岁人群1年1次单一LDCT筛查最具成本效用,其产生的人均效果为17.173个LY,人均效用为16.062个QALY,ICUR值为69965.507元/QALY。敏感性分析结果显示,该策略产生的ICUR值介于2021年1~3倍人均GDP阈值,且具有成本效用优势的概率达到92%。结论: NCC-LCm2021模型联合LDCT对非吸烟女性进行肺癌筛查的人均成本低于单一LDCT筛查,但以3倍人均GDP为WTP阈值时,50~74岁人群1年1次单一LDCT筛查最具成本效用,且稳健性良好,故非吸烟女性肺癌筛查优先推荐该策略。

关键词: 烟草,非吸烟, 肺肿瘤, 病人识别系统, 妇女卫生保健服务, 模型,经济学, 成本及成本分析

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the health economic value of lung cancer screening strategies in non-smoking women based on a decision-tree Markov model, to identify the optimal screening strategy to guide policy-making for lung cancer screening. Methods: A decision-tree Markov model for lung cancer screening strategies in non-smoking women aged 50-74 years was constructed using TreeAge Pro 2022 software. The parameters included epidemiological data (incidence and mortality rates), disease transition probabilities, screening and diagnostic performance parameters (modality, starting age, and screening interval), costs and health utility values. These parameters were derived from the China Cancer Registry Annual Report, the China Population Census Yearbook 2020, the 2018 China Adult Tobacco Survey Report, and high-quality published literature from both domestic and international sources. Then simulations were conducted for 100000 individuals each undergoing various low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening strategies (screening group) and those not receiving any lung cancer screening (non-screening group). Cost-utility analysis (including indicators such as 2021 gross domestic product (GDP), willingness to pay (WTP), incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and life years (LY)) and sensitivity analysis were subsequently performed. Results: Among the lung cancer screening strategies evaluated, all 12 single LDCT screening strategies demonstrated higher per-capita costs (range: 3355.64-10761.40 yuan) compared with the 12 strategies combining the NCC-LCm2021 model with LDCT (range: 1580.48-3287.68 yuan). The annual single LDCT screening strategy for the population aged 50-74 years had the highest per-capita cost (10761.40 yuan), while the strategy of conducting NCC-LCm2021 combined with LDCT screening every 5 years for the population aged 60-74 years had the lowest per capita cost (1580.48 yuan). When applying a three times the per-capita GDP (2021 year: 242928 yuan) as the WTP threshold, all screening strategies exhibited cost-utility advantages, with ICUR ranging from 69965.507 yuan/QALY to 158106.667 yuan/QALY. The annual single LDCT screening for the 50-74 years age group was the most cost-effective strategy, yielding 17.173 LY and 16.062 QALY, with an ICUR of approximately 69965.507 yuan/QALY. Sensitivity analysis showed that the ICUR value of generated between 1 and 3 times of the per capita GDP (2021 year) threshold, and the probability of having a cost-effectiveness advantage was 92%. Conclusion: The NCC-LCm2021 model combined with LDCT for lung cancer screening in non-smoking women incurs lower per-capita costs than single LDCT screening. However, with 3 times the per-capita GDP as the WTP threshold, annual single LDCT screening for the population aged 50-74 years represents the most cost-effective strategy, and has good robustness. Therefore, this strategy is recommended as the priority strategy for lung cancer screening in non-smoking women.

Key words: Tobacco, smokeless, Lung neoplasms, Patient identification systems, Women’s health services, Models, economic, Costs and cost analysis

中图分类号: