结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2): 158-161.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
收稿日期:
2021-12-07
出版日期:
2022-06-30
发布日期:
2022-04-18
通信作者:
伍建林
E-mail:cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com
JIANG Ge-ge, LIANG Yuan, DU Li-na, WU Jian-lin()
Received:
2021-12-07
Online:
2022-06-30
Published:
2022-04-18
Contact:
WU Jian-lin
E-mail:cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com
摘要:
肺磨玻璃结节(GGN)科学化管理是临床关注的热点问题,其中对GGN样肺腺癌的准确诊断及浸润程度的预测具有很大挑战。近年来,基于CT影像的圆度测量逐渐应用于对GGN的评估与诊断,并显现出良好的临床应用前景。作者对该方面的研究现状与进展做一综述,以为医学影像诊断提供参考。
中图分类号:
姜阁阁, 梁媛, 都丽娜, 伍建林. CT圆度测量评估磨玻璃结节样肺腺癌浸润程度研究进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(2): 158-161. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
JIANG Ge-ge, LIANG Yuan, DU Li-na, WU Jian-lin. Research progress of CT roundness measurement in evaluating the invasiveness of GGN-like lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022, 3(2): 158-161. doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210154
[1] |
刘琳, 焦宗林, 曾媛, 等. 浸润性肺腺癌不同病理亚型的研究进展. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(5):436-438,466. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2020.18.05.02.
doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2020.18.05.02 |
[2] |
Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 178(5):1053-1057. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053 URL |
[3] |
高鹏, 董志辉, 莫哲恒, 等. 亚厘米纯磨玻璃密度肺腺癌的计算机断层扫描特征及临床意义. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(7):728-730,755. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535. 2020.18.07.22.
doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535. 2020.18.07.22 |
[4] |
Kakinuma R, Noguchi M, Ashizawa K, et al. Natural History of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Thorac Oncol, 2016, 11(7):1012-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.006 pmid: 27089851 |
[5] |
Inamura K. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Mutations Driving Development of Early Lung Adenocarcinoma: Tumor Initiation and Progression. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(4):1259. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041259.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19041259 URL |
[6] |
黄定品, 傅钢泽, 蔡蒙婷, 等. 亚厘米纯磨玻璃密度结节肺腺癌的CT特征对其浸润性的预测价值. 温州医科大学学报, 2019, 49(11):837-841. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2019.11.010.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2019.11.010 |
[7] |
Heidinger BH, Anderson KR, Nemec U, et al. Lung Adenocarcinoma Manifesting as Pure Ground-Glass Nodules: Correlating CT Size, Volume, Density, and Roundness with Histopathologic Invasion and Size. J Thorac Oncol, 2017, 12(8):1288-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.017.
doi: S1556-0864(17)30425-2 pmid: 28576745 |
[8] |
Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, et al. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology, 2007, 245(1):267-275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682 URL |
[9] |
Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios. Radiographics, 2018, 38(5):1337-1350. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017 URL |
[10] |
Ding H, Shi J, Zhou X, et al. Value of CT Characteristics in Predicting Invasiveness of Adenocarcinoma Presented as Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 65(2):136-141. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587592.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587592 URL |
[11] |
Snoeckx A, Reyntiens P, Desbuquoit D, et al. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: size matters, but do not ignore the power of morphology. Insights Imaging, 2018, 9(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0581-2.
doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0581-2 URL |
[12] |
Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology, 2008, 246(3):697-722. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070712.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070712 pmid: 18195376 |
[13] |
Gu J, Lu C, Guo J, et al. Prognostic significance of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients-A single institution retrospective study of 292 lung adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol, 2013, 107(5):474-480. doi: 10.1002/jso.23259.
doi: 10.1002/jso.23259 URL |
[14] |
Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, et al. New IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and invasive tumor size are predictive of disease recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol, 2013, 8(5):612-618. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318287c3eb.
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318287c3eb pmid: 23584293 |
[15] |
Xu CH, Wang W, Wei Y, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(10):1430-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.004 pmid: 26123994 |
[16] |
Zhao Y, Wang R, Shen X, et al. Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(6):2099-2105. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5043-9.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5043-9 pmid: 26842488 |
[17] |
Hung JJ, Jeng WJ, Chou TY, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society lung adenocarcinoma classification on death and recurrence in completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(6):1079-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828920c0.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828920c0 URL |
[18] |
Miyoshi T, Shirakusa T, Ishikawa Y, et al. Possible mechanism of metastasis in lung adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern. Pathol Int, 2005, 55(7):419-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01847.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01847.x pmid: 15982217 |
[19] |
Roh MS, Lee JI, Choi PJ, et al. Relationship between micropapillary component and micrometastasis in the regional lymph nodes of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Histopathology, 2004, 45(6):580-586. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01953.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01953.x pmid: 15569048 |
[20] |
Chao L, Yi-Sheng H, Yu C, et al. Relevance of EGFR mutation with micropapillary pattern according to the novel IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification and correlation with prognosis in Chinese patients. Lung Cancer, 2014, 86(2):164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.018 pmid: 25236981 |
[21] |
Borghesi A, Scrimieri A, Michelini S, et al. Quantitative CT analysis for predicting the behavior of part-solid nodules with solid components less than 6 mm: size, density and shape descriptors. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(16):3428. doi: 10.3390/app9163428.
doi: 10.3390/app9163428 URL |
[22] |
Lee G, Park H, Lee HY, et al. Tumor Margin Contains Prognostic Information: Radiomic Margin Characteristics Analysis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(7):1676. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071676.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13071676 URL |
[23] |
巴文娟, 许迪, 尹柯, 等. HRCT征象评估纯磨玻璃结节浸润性:肺结节圆度优于长-短径比值和分叶深度. 放射学实践, 2020, 35(12):1542-1546. doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2020.12.009.
doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2020.12.009 |
[24] |
Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP, et al. A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules: part 1: radiologic characteristics and imaging modalities. Chest, 2013, 143(3):825-839. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0960.
doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0960 URL |
[25] |
Li X, Zhang W, Yu Y, et al. CT features and quantitative analysis of subsolid nodule lung adenocarcinoma for pathological classification prediction. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6556-6.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6556-6 URL |
[26] |
江森, 洪又佳, 李仰康. 肿瘤圆度——MRI形态学特征的量化指标在乳腺良恶性肿瘤及不同分子亚型乳腺癌中的应用研究. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(8):1289-1293. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.08.013.
doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.08.013 |
[27] |
Bae MS, Seo M, Kim KG, et al. Quantitative MRI morphology of invasive breast cancer: correlation with immunohistochemical biomarkers and subtypes. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(3):269-275. doi: 10.1177/0284185114524197.
doi: 10.1177/0284185114524197 URL |
[28] |
Yoon GY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al. Sonographic features that can be used to differentiate between small triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma. Ultrasonography, 2018, 37(2):149-156. doi: 10.14366/usg.17036.
doi: 10.14366/usg.17036 URL |
[29] |
Cao X, Li X, Wang X, et al. Use CT Imaging to Predict the Short-Term Outcome of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dose Response, 2019, 17(4): 1559325819897175. doi: 10.1177/1559325819897175.
doi: 10.1177/1559325819897175 |
[30] | 胡晓华, 陈娟, 王军. 研究胸部CT检查在孤立性肺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(4):217-218. |
[31] |
金鑫, 赵绍宏, 高洁, 等. 纯磨玻璃密度肺腺癌病理分类及影像表现特点分析. 中华放射学杂志, 2014, 48(4):283-287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.04.005.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.04.005 |
[32] |
余世裕. 磨玻璃密度肺结节的CT征象特点及定性诊断分析. 现代医用影像学, 2021, 30(2):310-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.02.028.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.02.028 |
[33] |
俞慧波, 陈中港, 李琼, 等. 月牙征预测纯磨玻璃结节肺腺癌浸润性的价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2021, 55(4):403-408. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200609-00791.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200609-00791 |
[34] |
Kobayashi Y, Mitsudomi T. Management of ground-glass opacities: should all pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity be surgically resected? Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2013, 2(5):354-363. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.09.03.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.09.03 |
[35] |
Nemec U, Heidinger BH, Anderson KR, et al. Software-based risk stratification of pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground glass nodules on computed tomography. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(1):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4937-2.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4937-2 URL |
[36] |
Borghesi A, Michelini S, Bertagna F, et al. Hilly or mountainous surface: a new CT feature to predict the behavior of pure ground glass nodules? Eur J Radiol Open, 2018, 5:177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.09.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.09.004 pmid: 30294620 |
[37] |
Aoki T. Predicting factors of ground-glass lung nodule for growth. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(Suppl 33):S3927-S3929. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.129.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.129 URL |
[38] |
李媛, 谢惠康, 武春燕. WHO胸部肿瘤分类(第5版)中肺肿瘤部分解读. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(7):574-580. doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.07.003.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.07.003 |
[1] | 袁叶荣, 官红莲. 一例儿童肺泡蛋白沉积症CT误诊分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 113-115. |
[2] | 赵永年, 张丽杰, 王童敏. 2014—2023年新疆生产建设兵团肺结核报告发病流行病学特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 30-34. |
[3] | 杨艳, 董文, 陈建军, 张玉. 2014—2023年湖北省十堰市竹溪县肺结核流行特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 40-45. |
[4] | 齐威, 赵恩奕. 2006—2020年天津市中心城区老年与非老年肺结核流行特征及变化趋势[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 46-54. |
[5] | 陈静, 秦娅莉, 王明栋, 杨儒斌, 王倩, 彭燕清, 邱继瑶, 张晓, 周昕艾. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus检测活动性肺结核的效能分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 61-67. |
[6] | 闫文华, 陈文君. 数智化健康教育在菌阳肺结核患者陪护者预防管理中的价值[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 73-78. |
[7] | 廖影, 庞艳, 赵静, 何高琴, 游茂林, 王蕾. 2018—2023年重庆市梁平区肺结核患者报告情况及发现延迟特征分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 8-13. |
[8] | 杨舒琪, 李锋. 程序性死亡受体1/程序性死亡-配体1抑制剂在结核病研究中的进展[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(1): 94-101. |
[9] | 罗苑园. 吸入用乙酰半胱氨酸溶液治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效评估[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 1-3. |
[10] | 倪慧珍, 李倩. 制霉菌素漱口液预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期院内继发口腔溃疡的效果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 4-6. |
[11] | 徐建. 沙丁胺醇联合布地奈德雾化吸入治疗急性加重期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床价值[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 7-9. |
[12] | 张海军. 多索茶碱联合噻托溴铵粉在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效评价[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 10-12. |
[13] | 欧庆芬. 非结核分枝杆菌肺病的CT诊断及鉴别诊断[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 13-14. |
[14] | 吴永红. 胸腺肽联合痰热清对老年慢阻肺合并肺部感染患者治疗有效性及肺功能改善分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 15-17. |
[15] | 郭帅, 汪容娟. 肺心病合并上消化道出血的临床治疗效果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(S): 18-20. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||