结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1): 33-43.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20210159

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

恢复期血浆治疗快速进展重型新型冠状病毒肺炎二例并文献复习

吴迪, 林芬, 陈晓红, 林友飞, 黄明翔, 陈力舟()   

  1. 福建省福州肺科医院,福州 350008
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-27 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-02-24
  • 通信作者: 陈力舟 E-mail:fkyyclz@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省科技计划项目(2020Y0007);福州市科技计划项目(2020-XG-024)

Convalescent plasma therapy for two cases of rapid progressing severe COVID-19 and literature review

WU Di, LIN Fen, CHEN Xiao-hong, LIN You-fei, HUANG Ming-xiang, CHEN Li-zhou()   

  1. Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350008, China
  • Received:2021-12-27 Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-02-24
  • Contact: CHEN Li-zhou E-mail:fkyyclz@163.com
  • Supported by:
    ocial Development Guide (Key) Project of Fujian Science and Technology Agency(2020Y0007);Fuzhou Science and Technology Project(2020-XG-024)

摘要:

目的: 探讨应用恢复期血浆治疗重型新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效及安全性。方法: 回顾性分析福建省福州肺科医院2020年3—4月收治的2例应用恢复期血浆治疗的快速进展重型新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的临床资料、诊治经过及随访情况,并进行文献复习。以“convalescent plasma”和“SARS-CoV-2”或“COVID-19”为检索词对PubMed数据库进行检索,以“恢复期血浆”和“新冠病毒”或“新型冠状病毒肺炎”为检索词,对中国知网和万方医学网数据库中的文献进行检索,检索时间截止到2021年11月。剔除综述类及资料不完整的文献,纳入恢复性血浆治疗重型、危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎资料完整的文献,收集患者的临床资料、疗效、转归及不良反应,并进行文献复习。结果: 病例1为女性患者,65岁,以“咳嗽、发热8d”为主诉入院;病例2为男性患者,57岁,以“咳嗽、咳痰、发热5d”为主诉入院。2例患者均确诊为重型新型冠状病毒肺炎,短期内胸部CT扫描提示肺部病灶进展,使用恢复期血浆治疗后,短期内症状得到改善,核酸转阴,胸部CT扫描提示肺部病灶较前吸收。通过筛选获得中文文献4篇,英文文献13篇,加上本研究收集的2例患者,使用恢复期血浆治疗的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者共计6623例,其中男性4121例,女性2502例;年龄范围18~99岁,死亡1595例,全因病亡率为24.08%;1160例发生不良反应,不良反应发生率为17.51%;插管率为13.05%(864/6623)。对照组(未使用恢复期血浆治疗)共计7213例,死亡1676例,全因病亡率为23.24%;1176例发生不良反应,不良反应发生率为16.30%;插管率为14.35%(1035/7213)。两组患者在全因病亡率(χ2=1.372,P=0.241)和不良反应发生率(χ2=3.607,P=0.058)方面差异均无统计学意义;插管率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.955,P=0.026)。结论: 恢复期血浆用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎患者较为安全,主要适用于重型、危重型的患者。恢复期血浆在改善COVID-19患者总病亡率方面的意义仍存在争议,但在尽可能短的时间内使用高滴度恢复期血浆,可能能够降低气管插管率。

关键词: 恢复期血浆, 冠状病毒感染, 肺炎,病毒性, 综述文献(主题)

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma in treatment of severe COVID-19. Methods: Clinical data, diagnosis and treatment, and follow-up of two cases of rapid progressing severe COVID-19 treated with convalescent plasma were retrospectively analyzed with review of literatures. These two patients were treated in Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital of Fujian Province from March to April, 2020. Literatures were searched with “convalescent plasma” and “SARS-CoV-2” or “COVID-19” as the retrieval terms in PubMed database, and searched with the retrieval words of “convalescent plasma” and “COVID-19” or “new coronavirus pneumonia” in CNKI and Wanfang medical network database with the retrieval time of November 2021. Literatures of incomplete reviews and incomplete data were excluded, and well-documented literatures of restorative plasma therapy for severe and severe COVID-19 were included. The clinical data, efficacy, outcome and adverse reactions were collected, and the literature was reviewed. Results: Case 1 was 65 years old, female, with chief complaint of “cough and fever for 8 days”; Case 2 was 57 years old, male, with chief complaint of “cough, expectoration and fever for 5 days”. Both of them were diagnosed as severe COVID-19. Chest CT scan showed the progress of lung lesions in the short term. Symptoms were improved in the short term after being treated with convalescent plasma, nucleic acid turned negative, and chest CT scan showed that the lung lesions were more absorbed than before. Cases from 4 Chinese literatures and 13 English articles selected, plus 2 new coronavirus pneumonia patients in this study, were totally 6623 treated with convalescent plasma (4121 were male and 2502 were female). They aged from 18 to 99 years old, and 1595 of them died, the all-cause mortality was 24.08%. Adverse reactions were found in 1160 cases, the incidence was 17.51%; the intubation rate was 13.05% (864/6623). In the control group (without convalescent plasma treatment, n=7213), 1676 cases died, and the all-cause mortality was 23.24%; 1176 cases had adverse reactions, the incidence was 16.30%; and the intubation rate was 14.35% (1035/7213). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (χ2=1.372, P=0.241) and incidence of adverse reactions (χ2=3.607, P=0.058) between the two groups. However, the intubation rate was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.955,P=0.026). Conclusion: Convalescent plasma is safe for COVID-19, especially for with severe or severe ones. The significance of convalescent plasma in improving the total mortality of COVID-19 patients is still controversial, but using high titer convalescent plasmas soon as possible may reduce the rate of endotracheal intubation.

Key words: Convalescent plasma, Coronavirus infections, Pneumonia,viral, Review literature as topic

中图分类号: