结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3): 159-163.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2013.03.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2012年黑龙江省结核病防治机构人力资源分析

郑桂兰,魏松庭,张景林,闫兴录,李发滨,韩雪   

  1. 150030 哈尔滨,黑龙江省结核病防治所
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-08 出版日期:2013-09-30 发布日期:2013-09-30
  • 通信作者: 郑桂兰,Email:huahua_0026@163.com

Human resources survey and assessment of tuberculosis prevention and control in Heilongjiang province

ZHENG Gui-lan, WEI Song-ting, ZHANG Jing-lin, YAN Xing-lu, LI Fa-bin, HAN Xue   

  1. Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Division,Heilongjiang Provincial Institute for Tuberculosis Control, Harbin 150030
  • Received:2013-04-08 Online:2013-09-30 Published:2013-09-30
  • Contact: ZHENG Gui-lan, Email: huahua_0026@163.com

摘要: 目的了解黑龙江省现有结核病防治(简称“结防”)机构人力资源情况,为进一步加强人力资源建设提供依据。方法根据2012年黑龙江省结核病管理信息系统年度报表,2012年黑龙江省从事结防工作的相关人员共有1520名,对上报数据进行汇总和分析。各组之间率的比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为有统计学意义;多组之间两两比较,P<0.0125为差异有统计学意义。结果省级、地市级、县区级结防机构中本科及以上学历的工作人员分别占66.67%(36/54)、42.99%(92/214)和18.29%(229/1252)。省级本科及本科以上的人员比率高于地市级(χ2=9.69,P<0.01),地市级高于县区级(χ2=65.20,P<0.01)。省级、地市级、县区级结防机构高级职称的工作人员分别占18.52%(10/54)、26.64%(57/214)和12.70%(159/1252);地市级高级职称人员比率高于县区级(χ2=28.25,P<0.01)。从事培训、健康教育和统计监测工作人员所占比率不到10%(9.14%,139/1520)。结防机构专业人员按照服务人口分布和面积分布的基尼系数分别为0.18和0.41。结论黑龙江省各级结防机构工作人员中高学历人员不足。结防机构人员按照服务面积分布已经高于警戒值,黑龙江省结核病防治机构人力资源建设亟待加强。

Abstract: Objective To learn the currant human resource status for tuberculosis(TB) control and prevention in Heilongjiang province, and to provide evidence for improving human resources development.Methods According to the annual report of the TB Information Management System of Heilongjiang province in 2012, there were 1520 TB control staff in Heilongjiang province. The reported data were collected and analyzed. χ2 test was used to compare the difference of rate among groups. P<0.05 was statistically significant. For multiple comparison among several groups, P<0.0125 was statistically significant.Results The proportion of TB control staff with undergraduate degree or above accounted for 66.67% (36/54) at provincial level, 42.99% (92/214) at prefecture level and 18.29%(229/1252) at county level. The proportion at province level was much higher than that at prefecture level (χ2=9.69, P<0.01), which was significantly higher than county level (χ2=65.20, P<0.01). The proportion of senior TB control staff accounted for 18.52% (10/54) at provincial level, 26.64% (57/214) at prefecture level and 12.70% (159/1252) at county level. The proportion at prefecture level was much higher than county level (χ2=28.25, P<0.01). The proportion of TB control staff in training, health education and statistics analysis was less than 10% (9.14%,139/1520). The Gini coefficient of TB control staff were 0.18 by population and 0.41 by area.Conclusion TB control staff with high education was insufficient. The distribution of TB control staff according to service area is higher than the alarm value. Therefore the human resource for TB control needs to be strengthened urgently.