结核与肺部疾病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3): 329-332.doi: 10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20260028

• 健康照护 • 上一篇    下一篇

一次性呼吸回路湿化液的更换时间研究

袁慧贞1(), 梁子东2, 孔雪莹3, 钟恺婷1   

  1. 1 东莞市妇幼保健院儿科重症监护室, 东莞 523057
    2 东莞市妇幼保健院医院感染管理科, 东莞 523057
    3 东莞市妇幼保健院检验科, 东莞 523057
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-22 出版日期:2026-06-20 发布日期:2026-06-12
  • 通信作者: 袁慧贞 E-mail:luoxh0111@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    东莞市社会发展面上项目(20221800900402)

Study on the replacement time of humidification solution for one-time respiratory circuit

Yuan Huizhen1(), Liang Zidong2, Kong Xueying3, Zhong Kaiting1   

  1. 1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan 523057, China
    2 Hospital Infection Management Department, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan 523057, China
    3 Laboratory Department, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan 523057, China
  • Received:2026-02-22 Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-06-12
  • Contact: Yuan Huizhen E-mail:luoxh0111@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Surface Project of Social Development in Dongguan City(20221800900402)

摘要:

目的: 对一次性呼吸回路湿化液的最佳更换时间进行探讨,以降低呼吸机相关性肺炎(ventilator-associated pneumonia, VAP)的发生风险。方法: 收集2023年1月至2024年8月在东莞市妇幼保健院儿童重症监护室(pediatric intensive care unit, PICU)行机械通气治疗的80例患儿为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各40例。两组均通过一次性呼吸回路密闭式湿化装置连接灭菌注射用水进行匀速注入,对照组每24h更换灭菌注射用水,观察组使用完毕后更换,最长不超过96h更换一次,两组均于第7天常规更换呼吸机管道及湿化罐,对比两组VAP发生率、不同部位(呼吸机管道、冷凝水、湿化液)菌落培养结果、呼吸机参数,以及机械通气时间等临床指标。 结果: 观察组患儿治疗后VAP总发生率为10.0%(4/40),与对照组的20.0%(8/40)比较,差异无统计学意义(Fisher精确概率法,P=0.210);观察组呼吸机管道、冷凝水及湿化液等部位细菌培养阳性率分别为10.0%(4/40)、7.5%(3/40)及5.0%(2/40),明显低于对照组的50.0%(20/40)、45.0%(18/40)及40.0%(16/40),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.238,P<0.001;χ2=14.528,P<0.001;χ2=14.050,P<0.001)。观察组患儿机械通气时间和PICU住院时间分别为(8.21±1.90)d和(11.81±2.82)d,与对照组的(8.51±2.10)d及(12.31±3.01)d比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.662,P=0.510;t=0.773,P=0.442)。结论: 对于PICU行机械通气的患儿,一次性呼吸回路密闭式湿化装置湿化液使用完毕后的更换策略,并未增加VAP发生率,是一种安全有效的更换方案。

关键词: 通气机, 机械, 呼吸, 湿化液, 肺炎, 呼吸机相关性

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the optimal replacement time of disposable breathing circuit humidification solution in order to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: A total of 80 children who underwent mechanical ventilation treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2023 to August 2024 were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 40 cases in each group. Both groups were connected to closed humidification devices with disposable breathing circuit and infused sterilized injection water at a constant speed. The control group replaced sterilized injection water every 24 hours, while the observation group replaced it after being used up, with the longest replacement time not exceeding 96 hours. On the 7th day, both groups replaced their ventilator pipelines and humidification tanks routinely. Clinical indicators such as the incidence of VAP, bacterial culture results of different sites (ventilator pipelines, condensate water, humidification solution), ventilator parameters, and mechanical ventilation time were compared between the two groups. Results: The total incidence of VAP in the observation group after treatment was 10.0% (4/40), which was not statistically different from 20.0% (8/40) in the control group (Fisher’s exact probability test, P=0.210); the positive rates of bacterial culture in the observation group for ventilator pipelines, condensate water, and humidification solution were 10.0% (4/40), 7.5% (3/40), and 5.0% (2/40), respectively, which were significantly lower than 50.0% (20/40), 45.0% (18/40), and 40.0% (16/40) in the control group (χ2=15.238, P<0.001; χ2=14.528, P<0.001; χ2=14.050, P<0.001). The average mechanical ventilation time and PICU hospitalization time of the observation group were (8.21±1.90) days and (11.81±2.82) days, respectively, which were not statistically different from (8.51±2.10) days and (12.31±3.01) days in the control group (t=0.662, P=0.510; t=0.773, P=0.442). Conclusion: For children undergoing mechanical ventilation in the PICU, the strategy of replacing disposable breathing circuit humidification solution after being used up does not increase the incidence of VAP and is a safe and effective replacement method.

Key words: Ventilators, mechanical, Respiration, Humidification solution, Pneumonia, ventilator-associated

中图分类号: