结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4): 249-252.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2019.04.004
收稿日期:
2019-10-09
出版日期:
2019-12-30
发布日期:
2019-12-30
通信作者:
严晓峰
E-mail:2429918342@qq.com
基金资助:
Received:
2019-10-09
Online:
2019-12-30
Published:
2019-12-30
Contact:
Xiao-feng YAN
E-mail:2429918342@qq.com
摘要:
难治性耐多药/广泛耐药结核病(multi/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis,MDR-TB/XDR-TB)仍然是威胁人类健康和致死性极强的公共卫生问题,随着贝达喹啉(bedaquiline,Bdq)、德拉马尼或普瑞马尼等新药的相继问世,采用Bdq加背景化疗方案(Bdq plus background regimen,BBR)治疗MDR-TB/XDR-TB取得了惊人的治疗成功率;Bdq连续使用18个月是安全和有效的,尚可惠及儿童、青少年、孕妇、HIV感染等特殊人群。但不可避免地出现的原发和获得性耐药、交叉耐药、结核复发、患者Q-T间期延长,以及与德拉马尼、普瑞马尼或氯法齐明等药物联用增加不良反应或死亡率等问题不容忽视。欲使Bdq新药持久地发挥临床疗效,期望加强对Bdq不良反应的认识,并采取相应的处理和保护措施,同时避免Bdq耐药的过早发生和蔓延。
杨松,严晓峰. 贝达喹啉治疗耐多药与广泛耐药结核病的现状和展望[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019, 8(4): 249-252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2019.04.004
Song YANG,Xiao-feng YAN. Current status and future prospects on the treatment of multi/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis with bedaquiline[J]. Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Health, 2019, 8(4): 249-252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2019.04.004
[1] |
Yadav S, Rawal G, Baxi M . Bedaquiline: A Novel Antitubercular Agent for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Tubercu-losis. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(8): FM01-FM02.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19052.8286 URL pmid: 27656462 |
[2] |
Lewis JM, Hine P, Walker J , et al. First experience of effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline for 18 months within an optimised regimen for XDR-TB. Eur Respir J, 2016,47(5):1581-1584.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01980-2015 URL pmid: 26917618 |
[3] |
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00210 URL pmid: 31852741 |
[4] |
World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_579_19 URL pmid: 31249191 |
[5] | 中华医学会结核病学分会. 中国耐多药和利福平耐药结核病治疗专家共识(2019年版). 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2019,42(10):733-749. |
[6] | 中国防痨协会. 耐药结核病化学治疗指南(2019年简版). 中国防痨杂志, 2019,41(10):1025-1073. |
[7] | 中华医学会结核病学分会. 抗结核新药贝达喹啉临床应用专家共识. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018,41(6):69-74. |
[8] |
Singh P, Kumari R, Lal R , et al. Bedaquiline: Fallible Hope Against Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Indian J Microbiol, 2017,57(4):371-377.
doi: 10.1007/s12088-017-0674-0 URL pmid: 29151636 |
[9] |
Kundu S, Biukovic G, Grüber G , et al. Bedaquiline Targets the ε Subunit of Mycobacterial F-ATP Synthase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016,60(11):6977-6979.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01291-16 URL pmid: 27620476 |
[10] |
Hards K, McMillan DGG, Schurig-Briccio LA, et al. Ionophoric effects of the antitubercular drug bedaquiline. PNAS, 2018,115(28):7326-7331.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803723115 URL pmid: 29941569 |
[11] |
Aguilar-Ayala DA, Cnockaert M, Andr E , et al. In vitro activity of bedaquiline against rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Med Microbiol, 2017,66(8):1140-1143.
doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000537 URL pmid: 28749330 |
[12] |
Riccardi N, Del Puente F, Magnè F , et al. Bedaquiline: A New Hope for Shorter and Better Anti-Tuberculosis Regimens. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov, 2018,13(1):3-11.
doi: 10.2174/1574891X12666170619101904 URL pmid: 28625141 |
[13] |
Cox V, Brigden G, Crespo RH , et al. Global programmatic use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2018,22(4):407-412.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0706 URL pmid: 29562988 |
[14] |
Dheda K, Esmail A, Limberis J , et al. Selected questions and controversies about bedaquiline: a view from the field. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2016,20(12):24-32.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0065 URL pmid: 28240569 |
[15] |
Borisov SE, Dheda K, Enwerem M , et al. Effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB: a multicentre study. Eur Respir J, 2017, 49(5). pii: 1700387.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02047-2016 URL pmid: 28546280 |
[16] |
Olaru ID, Heyckendorf J, Andres S , et al. Bedaquiline-based treatment regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J, 2017, 49(5). pii: 1700742.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00742-2017 URL pmid: 28529207 |
[17] |
Guglielmetti L, Hewison C, Avaliani Z , et al. Examples of bedquiline introduction for the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in five countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2017,21(2):167-174.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0493 URL pmid: 28234080 |
[18] |
Hewison C, Bastard M, Khachatryan N , et al. Is 6 months of bedaquiline enough? Results from the compassionate use of bedaquiline in Armenia and Georgia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2018,22(7):766-772.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0840 URL pmid: 29914602 |
[19] |
Guglielmetti L, Jaspard M, Dû DL , et al. Long-term outcome and safety of prolonged bedaquiline treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J, 2017, 49(3). pii: 1601799.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01799-2016 URL pmid: 28182570 |
[20] |
Jang JC, Jung YG, Choi J , et al. Bedaquiline susceptibility test for totally drug-resistant tuberculosis Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Microbiol, 2017,5(6):483-487.
doi: 10.1007/s12275-017-6630-1 URL pmid: 28429168 |
[21] |
Achar J, Hewison C, Cavalheiro AP , et al. Off-Label Use of Bedaquiline in Children and Adolescents with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis, 2017,23(10):1711-1713.
doi: 10.3201/eid2310.170303 URL pmid: 28758889 |
[22] |
Jaspard M, Elefant-Amoura E, Melonio I , et al. Bedaquiline and Linezolid for Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Pregnant Woman. Emerg Infect Dis, 2017,23(10):1731-1732.
doi: 10.3201/eid2310.161398 URL pmid: 28792382 |
[23] |
Tadolini T, Lingtsang RD, Tiberi S , et al. Report of the first case, concerns and challenges of treatment of severe XDR-TB with both delamanid and bedaquiline. Eur Respir J, 2016,48(3):935-938.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00637-2016 URL pmid: 27288039 |
[24] |
Migliori GB, Pontali E, Sotgiu G, et al. Combined Use of Delamanid and Bedaquiline to Treat Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci , 2017, 18(2). pii: E341.
doi: 10.3390/ijms18020341 URL pmid: 28178199 |
[25] |
Li Y, Sun F, Zhang W . Bedaquiline and delamanid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Promising but challenging. Drug Dev Res, 2019,80(1):98-105.
doi: 10.1002/ddr.21498 URL pmid: 30548290 |
[26] |
Kim CT, Kim TO, Shin HJ , et al. Bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre cohort study in Korea. Eur Respir J, 2018, 51(3). pii: 1702467.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02467-2017 URL pmid: 29545276 |
[27] |
Xu J, Li SY, Almeida DV , et al. Contribution of Pretomanidto Novel Regimens Containing Bedaquilinewith either Linezolid or Moxifloxacin and Pyrazinamide in Murine Models of Tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2019, 63(5). pii:e00021-19.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00021-19 URL pmid: 30833432 |
[28] |
Keam SJ . Pretomanid: First Approval. Drugs, 2019,79(16):1797-1803.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01207-9 URL pmid: 31583606 |
[29] |
Li H, Salinger DH, Everitt D , et al. Long-Term Effects on QT Prolongation ofPretomanid Alone and in Combinations in Patients with Tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2019, 63(10). pii:e00445-19.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00445-19 URL pmid: 31358590 |
[30] |
Smyej I, De Jonghe S, VLooszova A , et al. Dose- and Time-dependency of the Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Bedaquiline and Its N-desmethyl Metabolite in Dogs. ToxicolPathol, 2017,45(5):663-675.
doi: 10.1177/0192623317723085 URL pmid: 28789609 |
[31] |
Guglielmetti L . Bedaquiline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: another missed opportunity? Eur Respir J, 2017,49:1700738.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00738-2017 URL pmid: 28529206 |
[32] |
Guglielmetti L, Le Du D, Veziris N , et al. Is bedaquiline as effective as fluoroquinolones in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis? Eur Respir J, 2016,48(2):582-585.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00411-2016 URL pmid: 27338196 |
[33] |
Perrineau S, Lachâtre M, Lê MP , et al. Long-term plasma pharmacokinetics of bedaquiline for multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2019,23(1):99-104.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0042 URL pmid: 30674381 |
[34] |
Nguyen TVA, Anthony RM, Bañuls AL , et al. Bedaquiline Resistance: Its Emergence, Mechanism, and Prevention. Clin Infect Dis, 2018,66(10):1625-1630.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cix992 URL pmid: 29126225 |
[35] |
Pang Y, Zong ZJ, Huo FM, et al. In Vitro Drug Susceptibility of Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, Moxifloxacin,Gatifloxacin against Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Beijing, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother , 2017, 61(10). pii:e00900-17.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00900-17 URL pmid: 28739779 |
[36] |
Lopez B, Siqueira de OliveiraR, Pinhata JMW, et al. Beda-quiline and linezolid MIC distributions and epidemiological cut-off values for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Latin American region. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2019,74(2):373-379.
doi: 10.1093/jac/dky414 URL pmid: 30358851 |
[37] |
Xu J, Wang B, Hu MH , et al. Primary Clofazimine and Bedaquiline, Resistance among Isolates from Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017, 61(6). pii:e00239-17.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00239-17 URL pmid: 28320727 |
[38] |
Ismail N, Peters RPH, Ismail NA , et al. Clofazimine exposure in vitro selects efflux pump mutants and bedaquiline resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2019, 63(3). pii:e02141-18.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02141-18 URL pmid: 30642938 |
[39] |
Almeida D, Ioerger T, Tyagi S , et al. Mutations in pepQ Confer Low-Level Resistance to Bedaquiline and Clofazimine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016,60(8):4590-4599.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00753-16 URL pmid: 27185800 |
[40] |
Wallis RS, Good CE, O’Riordan MA, et al. Mycobactericidal activity of bedaquiline plus rifabutin or rifampin in ex vivo whole blood cultures of healthy volunteers: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2018,13(5):e0196756.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196756 URL pmid: 29718967 |
[1] | 周林, 刘二勇, 赵雁林. 选择适宜治疗方案 正确评估抗结核治疗疗效提高利福平敏感结核病治疗质量[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2023, 4(3): 189-193. |
[2] | 张修磊, 王倩, 夏丽, 刘远明, 郝焱, 郭琳. 肺结核X线胸片智能辅助诊断系统在基层医院的临床效能评价[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2022, 3(2): 96-101. |
[3] | 李源, 高风华, 金锋. DOTS联合微信管理方式对肺结核患者治疗管理效果的评价[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2021, 2(1): 50-53. |
[4] | 王颖, 蔡春葵, 许岩, 孙诗学, 李刚, 顾晓峰, 于洋. 利奈唑胺治疗广泛耐药肺结核疗效分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2020, 1(2): 136-139. |
[5] | 景睿, 曹艳民, 杨一军, 武鸿燕, 蔡俊丽, 任雯, 张文茜, 王美花. 电子药盒和手机微信APP 对肺结核患者督导服药管理的应用研究[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2020, 1(1): 96-99. |
[6] | 王春婷, 李雅琪, 米艳, 莫念春, 刘红燕, 乐星, 周丽, 吴碧峰, 韩诗云, 白丽琼, 张传芳. 活动性肺结核患者化疗疗程中不同时期肺功能监测结果分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2020, 1(1): 39-44. |
[7] | 邓国防, 雷建平. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊治要点浅析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2020, 9(1): 7-10. |
[8] | 蒋玲, 罗廷茹, 周小琦, 唐娜, 蒙昌平, 钱春芳. 含利奈唑胺化疗方案治疗重症结核性脑膜炎的效果评价[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2020, 9(1): 44-48. |
[9] | 沙巍. 浅谈结核病专科医生在学校结核病诊治中的责任[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019, 8(2): 83-85. |
[10] | 温保江,邓小懂,冯光永,温文沛. 广东省不同结核病防治体系模式的工作成效分析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019, 8(1): 19-23. |
[11] | 彭建明,刘志东,钟球,刘林华,陈亮,李晓芬,翁剑峰,黄必为,陈文杰. 基于微信的多功能肺结核防治管理信息系统应用效果评价[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2018, 7(1): 74-76. |
[12] | 陈壮濠,林健雄,彭东东,陈蕊明,陈晓颖,温文沛. 《汕头市结核病患者健康管理信息系统》的创建与应用评价[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2018, 7(1): 60-63. |
[13] | 陈禹,李桂琴. 泌尿系结核并发慢性肾脏病的临床分析(附三例报告)[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017, 6(3): 222-228. |
[14] | 缪昌东 张德坤 姜继军 宗文宏. 初治涂阳肺结核并发2型糖尿病52例患者的临床分析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017, 6(2): 144-147. |
[15] | 王芙蓉,高飞. 13例利福平耐药结核病患者采用标准方案治疗的效果分析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017, 6(1): 82-84. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||