结核病与肺部健康杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3): 265-269.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.03.000

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

理性情绪疗法对肺结核患者不良情绪的影响

董霞,张芹,王洪梅,李冰   

  1. 277500 山东省枣庄市王开传染病医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-12 出版日期:2017-09-30 发布日期:2017-09-30
  • 作者简介:李冰

The effects of rational-emotive therapy on the negative emotion of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

DONG Xia, ZHANG Qin, WANG Hong-mei, LI Bing   

  1. Department of Nursing, Zaozhuang Municipal Wangkai Infectious Diseases Hospital, Shandong Province, Zaozhuang 277500, China
  • Received:2017-06-12 Online:2017-09-30 Published:2017-09-30

摘要: 目的 探讨理性情绪疗法对肺结核患者焦虑与抑郁情绪的影响。 方法 对2016年1—10月在山东省枣庄市王开传染病医院住院并确诊的肺结核患者进行心理评估,将存在心理障碍的80例患者按入院时间依次排序为1~80号,奇数患者列为干预组,偶数患者列为对照组,每组各40例。对照组按照常规的方法进行沟通和护理,干预组在此基础上采取理性情绪疗法的干预措施对患者实施针对性、个体化的心理护理,采用Zung氏焦虑抑郁量表评估两组患者焦虑、抑郁症状程度,比较两组患者干预前后焦虑、抑郁状况的改善情况。 结果 心理干预前,干预组患者焦虑症状平均得分为(60.13±7.15)分,抑郁症状平均得分为(62.63±6.40)分;对照组焦虑症状平均得分为(60.18±7.36)分,抑郁症状平均得分为(62.10±6.44)分,两组患者焦虑症状和抑郁症状评分差异均无统计学意义(t值分别为-0.03、-0.37,P值分别为0.975、0.716)。心理干预后,干预组患者焦虑症状平均得分为(52.97±6.98)分,抑郁症状平均得分为(55.60±6.23)分;对照组患者焦虑症状平均得分为(58.08±6.99)分,抑郁症状平均得分为(60.30±6.35)分,干预组患者焦虑症状评分和抑郁症状评分均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-3.28、-3.34,P值分别为0.020、0.010)。 结论 对肺结核患者及时实施理性情绪疗法干预能有效减轻焦虑、抑郁等不良情绪的影响。

Abstract: Objective To discuss the effects of rational-emotive therapy on anxiety and depression in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods The hospitalized patients diagnosed with tuberculosis from Jan to Oct in 2016 in Wangkai Infectious Diseases Hospital were carried out psychological evaluation. The eighty cases with psychological disorder were sequenced from the first to the eightieth according to the admission time. The patients with odds number were divided in the intervention group, and the patients with even numbers were divided in the control group. Forty cases in each group. Control group followed the conventional method of communication and care, while the patients in the intervention group received targeted, personalized psychological care based on the rational-emotive therapy interventions.The anxiety and depression of the patients in the two groups were assessed by using Zung’s scale of anxiety and depression. The improvement of the patients in two groups in anxiety and depression before and after intervention were compared. Results Before the psychological intervention, the average anxiety score for the intervention group patients was 60.13±7.15, and the average depression score of 62.63±6.40. The average anxiety score for the control group patients was 60.18±7.36, and the average depression score of 62.10±6.44. The difference of the average score of anxiety and depression in the two groups were not statistically significant (t value were respectively-0.03 and-0.37 and P value were respectively 0.975 and 0.716). After the psychological intervention, the anxiety score for the intervention group patients was 52.97±6.98, and the average depression score of 55.60±6.23. The average anxiety score for the control group patients was 58.08±6.99, and the average depression score of 60.30±6.35. The average score of anxiety and depression in the intervention group were obviously lower than those in the control group, and the difference were statistically significant (t value were respectively-3.28 and-3.34 and P value were respectively 0.020 and 0.010). Conclusion Timely implementation of rational-emotive therapy in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis interventions can effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and emotional impact.