Objective: To explore the effect of rapid time-effect management mode on bedside bronchoscope sputum suction in critically ill patients. Methods: A total of 100 critically ill patients who received bedside bronchoscopic sputum aspiration in the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from November 2024 to October 2025 were enrolled in this study. Allocation concealment was implemented using the sealed envelope method, and patients were assigned to an observation group and a control group via the random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group received intervention based on the rapid time-effect management mode. The two groups were compared in terms of clinical observation indicators, complication incidence, respiratory function indicators, blood gas analysis indicators, psychological status, self-efficacy and comfort level. Results: After intervention, the operation time, dyspnea recovery time, cough recovery time and hospital stay in the observation group were (20.66±2.84) min, (12.34±1.66) d, (12.38±1.63) d and (23.22±1.96) d respectively, all shorter than those in the control group ((41.48±2.44) min, (20.36±3.34) d, (21.32±3.43) d, (30.94±1.97) d), with statistically significant differences (t=-39.586, -15.193, -16.646, -19.618; all P<0.01).After intervention, the respiratory rate (RR), airway pressure (AP) and tidal volume (TV) in the observation group were (18.34±1.70) breaths/min, (10.54±0.50) mmHg and (8.44±0.50) ml/kg respectively, all better than those in the control group ((22.70±1.17) breaths/min, (8.44±0.50) mmHg, (7.52±0.51) ml/kg), with statistically significant differences (t=-15.305, 20.898, 9.144; all P<0.01).After intervention, the pH value, partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in the observation group were 7.41±0.04, (78.38±2.19) mmHg, (96.16±1.18) % and (42.44±1.51) mmHg respectively, all better than those in the control group (7.33±0.05, (64.06±2.65) mmHg, (89.84±1.42) %, (51.28±1.94) mmHg), with statistically significant differences (t=8.828, 29.467, 24.175, -25.415; all P<0.01).After intervention, the scores of the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) in the observation group were (36.32±2.64), (36.08±2.36), (33.44±1.09) and (94.86±3.15) points respectively, all better than those in the control group ((47.50±1.74), (47.22±1.50), (22.92±1.81), (75.08±2.16) points), with statistically significant differences (t=-25.015, -28.129, 35.267, 36.648; all P<0.01).The total incidence of complications in the observation group after intervention was 4.00% (2/50), which was lower than 20.00% (10/50) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.640, P=0.031). Conclusion: The application of the rapid time-effect management mode in patients undergoing bedside flexible bronchoscopy in PCCM can significantly improve respiratory function, hemodynamics and psychological status, enhance self-efficacy and nursing comfort, help shorten the clinical treatment cycle, and reduce the risk of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.